I am reliably informed that, although the paeds standards document is on the RCPCH website, it came from the Intercollegiate Committee which has 2 CEM representatives, and the document was approved by CEM.
http://www.apagbi.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/Intercollegiate%20Emegency%20Standards%202012%20FINAL%20WEB.pdf
I think that in making its comments the CQC just looked at the summary table and did not read the document itself - as the section says: "...... Indeed, it is acknowledged that many departments are unable to provide sufficient children's nurses to ensure that one is on duty at all times. In these departments, there should be a plan in place to achieve this, in addition to ensuring that nurses access more detailed education in the care of children and young people, to be able to offer advice and support to other staff."
So I would say that if you have a plan in place to recruit more paeds nurses (subject to availability) and you have compensated for the lack by ensuring that the rest of your nurses are well trained in paed aspects, then you have fulfilled both the spirit and the letter of the Standard.
Tim.
------------------------------------
Prof. Timothy Coats
Professor of Emergency Medicine,
University of Leicester, UK
0116 252 3263
-----Original Message-----
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ray McGlone
Sent: 01 July 2014 11:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 26 Jun 2014 to 27 Jun 2014 (#2014-17)
Warning: This message contains unverified links which may not be safe. You should only click links if you are sure they are from a trusted source.
Agreed
How come another Specialty can dictate what happens in the ED?
CQC then quotes it as though it is mandatory..... mind you in our report
they got the number of patients attending completely wrong. I think they
must have done a cut and paste with another department 67 miles away!
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bethel, Jim
Sent: 01 July 2014 11:13
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 26 Jun 2014 to 27 Jun 2014 (#2014-17)
came from the RCPCH - supported by the RCN Children and Young Adult Nursing
group - neither feasible/desirable/essential - in my humble opinion an ED
nurse with paed experience has as much place caring for sick kids as anyone
else
jim
________________________________________
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [[log in to unmask]] on
behalf of ACAD-AE-MED automatic digest system [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 28 June 2014 00:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 26 Jun 2014 to 27 Jun 2014 (#2014-17)
There are 4 messages totaling 638 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. CQC (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:05:14 +0100
From: Richard Bailey <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CQC
Probably none Ray - we have 1 children's trained nurse in total and have
failed to recruit more despite several attempts. We're hoping to establish a
children's assessment unit in ED when we redevelop the department in 2 years
time staffed by paediatric and ED nurses so that should go a long way to
resolving the issue. Not sure where the recommendation comes from
BW Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Jun 2014, at 18:09, Ray McGlone <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> We had a "Good" report from a recent CQC report but one point they
> stressed was the lack of a 24/7 paediatric nurse
>
> How many departments with no separate paediatric unit actually have 24/7
paediatric nurses? Most small to moderate sized general EM departments seem
to have difficulty retaining them as they get deskilled.
>
> Having worked nights recently in my own dept I didn't see many children at
0200 hrs.
>
> Does this standard come from the College or another body?
>
> Ray McGlone
> Lancaster
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:08:36 +0000
From: "McCormick Simon Dr, Consultant, A&E"
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CQC
We can't manage it, despite having nearly 18,000 under 18 a year.
Not many want to come and work in the ED, those that do tend to wear out
quite quickly (much more intense than on the ward) leave.
Few kids after midnight although the number of kids attending in the late
evening, early night continues to rise and is spilling over to after
midnight.
The bigger problem is the lack of medical expertise after midnight as many
of our MGs are locums with variable experience/expertise. We've ended up
making in mandatory to discuss ANY child under 3 months old at any time in
the department with a consultant and when we are not in they must be
discussed with the paediatric MG on-call. Just had too many errors made in
this group.
Simon
"Hospitals with overcrowded Emergency Departments are overcrowded hospitals
that have chosen to manifest the overcrowding in a single location"
Full Capacity protocol: an end to double standards in acute hospital care
provision Emerg Med J 2011;28:547-549
________________________________
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ray McGlone
Sent: 26 June 2014 18:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CQC
We had a "Good" report from a recent CQC report but one point they stressed
was the lack of a 24/7 paediatric nurse
How many departments with no separate paediatric unit actually have 24/7
paediatric nurses? Most small to moderate sized general EM departments seem
to have difficulty retaining them as they get deskilled.
Having worked nights recently in my own dept I didn't see many children at
0200 hrs.
Does this standard come from the College or another body?
Ray McGlone
Lancaster
------------------------------
This e-mail and any files that accompany it are intended only for the
appropriate use of the addressee/s, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If the reader is not an
intended recipient, any disclosure, distribution or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system
and notify the sender immediately. Any views or opinions presented do not
necessarily represent those of the Trust. Any unauthorised disclosure of the
information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited, as is use or
application of its contents other than for its intended purpose . Neither
Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust nor the sender accepts responsibility for
viruses. It is your responsibility to scan the email and any attachments.
------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:14:02 +0100
From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CQC
I think the recommendation is from the RCPH, not CEM
Sent from my iPad
> On 27 Jun 2014, at 11:05, Richard Bailey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Probably none Ray - we have 1 children's trained nurse in total and
> have failed to recruit more despite several attempts. We're hoping to
> establish a children's assessment unit in ED when we redevelop the
> department in 2 years time staffed by paediatric and ED nurses so that
> should go a long way to resolving the issue. Not sure where the
> recommendation comes from
>
> BW Bill
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 26 Jun 2014, at 18:09, Ray McGlone <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> We had a "Good" report from a recent CQC report but one point they
>> stressed was the lack of a 24/7 paediatric nurse
>>
>> How many departments with no separate paediatric unit actually have 24/7
paediatric nurses? Most small to moderate sized general EM departments seem
to have difficulty retaining them as they get deskilled.
>>
>> Having worked nights recently in my own dept I didn't see many children
at 0200 hrs.
>>
>> Does this standard come from the College or another body?
>>
>> Ray McGlone
>> Lancaster
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:24:33 -0700
From: Jel Coward <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CQC
I see many children in the practice every day I see many children in the
emerg dept most days I do not have a paediatric nurse. I am not a
paediatrician.
The kids get great care from our greatly skilled, true generalist,
nurses.....be that for minor illness or full-on resusc.
The opposite of a generalist is a partialist.....who would want one of
those? ;-)
....just sayin' ;-)
jel
On 26 June 2014 10:09, Ray McGlone <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We had a "Good" report from a recent CQC report but one point they
> stressed was the lack of a 24/7 paediatric nurse
>
>
>
> How many departments with no separate paediatric unit actually have
> 24/7 paediatric nurses? Most small to moderate sized general EM
> departments seem to have difficulty retaining them as they get deskilled.
>
>
>
> Having worked nights recently in my own dept I didn't see many
> children at
> 0200 hrs.
>
>
>
> Does this standard come from the College or another body?
>
>
>
> Ray McGlone
>
> Lancaster
>
--
Jel Coward
Some Open-Source and Creative Commons interests.....
The CARE Course http://www.theCAREcourse.ca Wilderness Medicine Twitter
account <http://twitter.com/#%21/wemsiint>
WEMSI-International http://WEMSI-International.org OSCAR open-source EMR
http://OSCARcanada.org
------------------------------
End of ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 26 Jun 2014 to 27 Jun 2014 (#2014-17)
*****************************************************************--
Scanned by iCritical.
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and / or privileged information and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) printed above. If you are not the addressee(s), any unauthorised review, disclosure, reproduction, other dissemination or use of this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance upon the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please return to the sender. No guarantee can be given that the contents of this email are virus free - The University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust cannot be held responsible for any failure by the recipient(s) to test for viruses before opening any attachments. The information contained in this e-mail may be the subject of public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed. Copyright in this email and any attachments created by us remains vested in the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust.
|