Dear Mark
This makes sense. Many thanks for your detailed response.
Liam.
On 2014-06-05 06:57, Mark Jenkinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you only have one subject then you can just use the results from
> the single run on that single subject from your first-level analysis.
> If you have multiple subjects and a single run per subject then you
> simply set-up a higher-level analysis that takes the first-level FEAT
> directories as input. You don't need to specifically extract any
> files yourself from the FEAT directory. See examples of standard
> higher-level analyses such as this in the FSL Course practicals.
>
> All the best,
> Mark
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2014, at 15:40, L. Nestor <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I sent an email some time ago (see below) regarding one functional run
>> of an fMRI paradigm. Steve Smith replied by saying that I could go
>> straight to ME cross-subject analysis at the second level. Can I just
>> confirm that the data that go into this analysis come from the
>> reg_standard/stats directory (which I have for each subject)?
>>
>> Also, can somebody point me to a link/previous thread detailing how
>> one can still perform a Fixed Effects analysis when you have only one
>> run?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Liam.
>>
>> Hi - only having a single run per subject is actually probably the
>> most common design and in this case you can go straight to ME
>> cross-subject analysis at the second level.
>> Steve
>>
>> On 11 Jun 2013, at 02:55, "L. Nestor" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FSL users
>>> What do you do in FSL when you only have one functional run of a
>>> task? Normally, you would have at least two functional runs, which
>>> you then average across in a higher level analysis using a Fixed
>>> Effects Model for each individual subject.
>>> Therefore, how do you do a Fixed Effects analysis on a single subject
>>> in FSL when you have only one feat directory from your first level
>>> analyses on just one run?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Liam.
|