On 5/31/14, 10:10 AM, "Josh Howlett" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>Aaa-saml defines an SAML NAI name identifier already, so I think we're
>almost there. The question in my mind is whether that is sufficient, or
>if we need to qualify this with the type of Moonshot AAA identifier being
>used? I don't believe we do, but interested in other views...
I can't imagine not needing to know at some point what the identifier
actually is. If nothing else, you've lost bidrectionality by losing that
information.
-- Scott
|