Hi
Yes, that looks OK. Do you maybe have 2 groups in your design, i.e. perform a between group 2-sample unpaired t-test in randomise? If so, finding significant _differences_ between groups outside the area of primary RSN is entirely possible. This is fully analogous to what can happen in star GLM analysis and requires careful interpretation.
hth
Christian
On 14 May 2014, at 18:01, sere f <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Mark,
>
> Melodic runs (with option Resampling resolution (4mm): on ) and it produces ICs.
> Registration runs, in fact ICs overlap well the MNI.
> Mask and maskAll in dual regression folder seems ok.
>
>
> I have 32 subjects and 50 ICs.
>
> In dual regression folder I get:
>
> dr_stage1_subject00001.txt
> .....
> dr_stage1_subject00032.txt
>
>
> dr_stage2_ic0000.nii
> .....
> dr_stage2_ic0049.nii
>
>
> dr_stage2_subject00001_Z.nii
> ......
> dr_stage2_subject00032_Z.nii
>
>
> dr_stage2_subject00001.nii
> ......
> dr_stage2_subject00032.nii
>
>
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tfce_corrp_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tfce_corrp_tstat2.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tfce_p_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tfce_p_tstat2.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0000_tstat2.nii
>
> .........
>
>
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tfce_corrp_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tfce_corrp_tstat2.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tfce_p_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tfce_p_tstat2.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tstat1.nii
> dr_stage3_ic0049_tstat2.nii
>
>
> Is the output of DR ok?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Serena.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really need some more information to be able to help.
> Have you carefully checked if the registrations are working correctly?
>
> All the best,
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 13 May 2014, at 18:52, sere f <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mark,
>>
>> dual regression runs and it finishes but the dr_stage3_icxxxx_tfce_corrp_tstat1s show voxels outside the correspondent IC voxels.
>> I don't think that they are reasonable results.
>>
>> S.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've not seen this.
>> It might be something specific to Ubuntu.
>> If it produces correct looking outputs then you can probably ignore the message.
>> If it does not produce outputs then try it again and see if you get this consistently or not.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On 6 May 2014, at 17:07, sere f <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear FLS users,
>> >
>> > I am running Dual Regression and I get this message:
>> >
>> > FSL is closed unexpectedly:
>> > …….
>> > ProcCmdline
>> > /usr/share/fsl/5.0/bin/fsl_glm -i grot -d /home/username/../../../dr_stage1_subject00000.txt -o /usr/share/fsl/5.0/bin/fsl_glm -i grot -d /home/username/../../../dr_stage2_subject00000.txt -outz=/home/username/../../../dr_stage2_subject00000_Z -demean -m /home/username/../../..mask -des_norm
>> > ………
>> >
>> > DR script does not stop and it still runs.
>> >
>> > I utilize Ubuntu 12.04
>> >
>> > Is it bad error or not?
>> >
>> > Thanks for any advice.
>>
>
>
|