:)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Sheila, for Mrs Slocombe -
>
> never saw her name spelled till I looked via google at this:
>
> http://scenteddemented.com/aybs.html
>
> but it leaves me uncertain how she pronounced onanimous.
>
> Max
>
>> On 04/03/2014, at 6:30 AM, Sheila Murphy wrote:
>>
>> To quote Mrs. Slocum, "I am Onanimous in that." (SORRY!) :)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>> It only seemed that way, Tim. As Sheila says, it was an effect created by a
>>> haha. The phoenix of course was standard kit in all post Roman central
>>> heating systems near to Camelot.
>>> Sorry about your diifficulties with AOL. They along with Google and Gmail
>>> are examples of what happens if we commit the sin of Onan and I am afraid
>>> that is standard advice on most business courses now.
>>> Anyway, must go; do take Doug's post seriously. I mean, it may sound
>>> comforting; but do think about it. pp Herod, T G
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3 March 2014 18:14, Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. But when I was a kid Arizona was part of Dorset, and Phoenix
>>>> itself was part of my house. I think Sheila would understand this. Ah
>>>> Sutton, I've been there - got very drunk on all the free champaign at a
>>>> wedding reception and had to miss the dancing.
|