On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Hammond <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Bill Long <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Bill Long <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is no Fortran LOGICAL representation that matches the corresponding c _Bool then the value of c_bool in the iso_c_binding module should be -1. If that is what you find, then the compiler is behaving correctly.
>>>>
>>>> The value of c_bool on Intel on my machine is "1", however, the type
>>>> is not interoperable, unless you specify -fpscomp logical. Btw, Cray
>>>> seems to have the same issue, see the results from a colleague who has
>>>> access to Cray: https://gist.github.com/jeffhammond/9746080
>>>
>>> I’m not sure what Jeff is doing. I tried the example codes in the github link with the Cray compiler and get:
>
> Either my shell scripting sucks or modules does not have well-behaved
> error code behavior. As a result, I was getting the Intel compiler
> when requesting the Cray one. I fixed it now and got the expected
> result, i.e. the same as Bill.
Thanks Jeff for the follow up.
Ondrej
|