Hi Manfred...
Let me know the patch (case you want to distribute it) and we can add it
to blahp packages.
Cheers
Goncalo
On 02/27/2014 11:30 AM, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
> Hi Goncalo,
>
> regarding the memory requirements parsed by
> sge_local_submit_attributes.sh Manfred asked my to forward his answer
> (his mail got rejected)
>
> Hi Goncalo,
>
>> I guess you have been changing sge_local_submit_attributes.sh
> yes, I have changed sge_local_submit_attributes.sh to implement the
> proper translation of $GlueHostMainMemoryRAMSize to s_rss (not: r_vmem
> according to the GLUE schema usage guide), and
> $GlueHostMainMemoryVirtualSize to s_vmem.
>
> Cheers,
> Manfred
>
>
> On 27.02.2014 11:48, Gonçalo Borges wrote:
>> Yup.. Can't access even with my CERN account (I'm not in ATLAS group)
>>
>> I guess you have been changing sge_local_submit_attributes.sh to
>> implement those changes, right?! If you send us the patch, we can check
>> it and try to push it into BLAHP package.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Goncalo
>>
>> On 02/27/2014 10:28 AM, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> I started sketched our experiences with jdl vs. SGE on a twiki page in
>>> AtlasComputing
>>>
>>> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasComputing/JobRequirementsSGE
>>>
>>> btw: since the page got automatically behind an ACL wall: is there a
>>> wiki, that is usable without CERN/LHC VO affiliations in case site
>>> admins without affiliations need access?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> On 27.02.2014 09:22, Jeff Templon wrote:
>>>> Yo,
>>>>
>>>> Dennis van Dok's results for torque / maui are here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Passing_job_requirements_through_the_WMS
>>>>
>>>> AFAICT there is a degree of arbitrariness in which (and how)
>>>> requirements are translated from the JDL to the batch system. My
>>>> opinion is that some small team should sit down and decide what the
>>>> desired behavior is, and then work on implementing this behavior on
>>>> each of the batch systems. It would be really great if this same
>>>> behavior is reproduced when passing requirements to an ARC CE or a
>>>> GRAM 5 CE.
>>>>
>>>> The coordination sounds like a job for EGI, however I think the input
>>>> to this coordination has to come from a discussion between sites and
>>>> the users; sites should drive the discussion, as the sites are the
>>>> parties that understand the use cases from multiple user
>>>> communities. Since the WLCG multicore TF is already working on
>>>> related issues, we can probably find at least a subset of the right
>>>> group of people there. Thomas is one of them!
>>>>
>>>> JT
>>>> On Feb 26, 2014, at 19:18 , Thomas Hartmann
>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Goncalo and Maarten,
>>>>>
>>>>> after some more testing (and debugging of my script...) we were able to
>>>>> get CERequirements getting piped to SGE, e.g.
>>>>>
>>>>> CERequirements = "other.GlueHostMainMemoryVirtualSize > 2000";
>>>>> or other.GlueCEPolicyMaxWallClockTime > 30
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, we tested successfully the CPUTime, WallTime, Mem and VMem
>>>>> parameters passing from the jdl to the finally submitted SGE
>>>>> wrapper/job.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know, if there are further experiences for SGE and other batch
>>>>> systems how the implementation/support is for the various parameters?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers and many thanks for your help,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>
|