On 31 January 2014 12:37, Stephen Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 10:48 AM, Sam Skipsey wrote:
>>
>> On 30 January 2014 17:25, sjones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-01-30 17:17, Ewan MacMahon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All of them. Ewan
>>>
>>> We really need to get DPM hooked into the mainstream security (ARGUS?).
>>> Or
>>> get the mainstream security hooked into DPM.
>>
>> So, there *is* a mechanism for hooking DPM into the "mainstream"
>>
>> security. Unfortunately, it has had packaging/release problems (as DPM
>> is in EPEL now, but ARGUS is not, and so DPM itself could not release
>> the mechanism as a package, since it would violate the EPEL
>> requirements by depending on a package that was not in SL or EPEL...).
>
>
> Can the "mechanism" be released in the form of an optional
> ARGUS plug-in that can be combined with the EPEL version of DPM?
>
So, as I said, it's currently with the ARGUS developers! ;)
>
>> I note, however, that DPM's "VO support" is actually simpler than
>> ARGUS (et al)s, as it does not rely upon poolaccount <-> user mappings
>> for Users or VOs. ;)
>
>
> It's fine and dandy if ARGUS has too much functionality,
> because sledgehammers can crack nuts pretty easily...
>
Oh, indeed.
Sam
> Steve
>
>
> --
> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> System Administrator office: 220
> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794 2334
> University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
|