Hi Kate this is exactly what I'm planning to do with crazy pictures to try and liven it up a bit!



Jackie





Jackie Johnson                    

Metadata Team Leader

Library Services

University of Birmingham  

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 2TT

[log in to unmask]

0121-414-2767



Please note I do not work Mondays



Twitter: @uoblibservices

Website: https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/library













-----Original Message-----

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kate Kluttz

Sent: 13 January 2014 12:06

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] What to tell non-cataloguing staff about RDA?



I'm really interested in this one, too, as it's just started sinking in that I probably need to provide something to our non-cat staff.  So far I've only been able to come up with:

        *Very basic introduction to FRBR concepts

        *Very brief history of the development of RDA/why we are adopting

        *Details on AACR2 v RDA changes they may notice in the catalogue, like spelled-out abbreviations, and new fields like 33X (we don't display those in the OPAC but staff can see them in the staff module)

        *ummmmmm ... not sure what else. I'd like to get into a little bit about relationships and why RDA is better in that respect, but I'm not sure that a) I can explain this, or b) our system can actually do anything with this yet.  Maybe I can use someone else's system to demonstrate??





Kate Kluttz

Acquisitions & Metadata Librarian

University of the Arts London Library Services

020 7514 8586

[log in to unmask]

www.arts.ac.uk/library













-----Original Message-----

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicky Ransom

Sent: 13 January 2014 11:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Who was/is involved in the decision/preparation? Did you have to justify it to senior managers



I'm interested in the point that Katrina mentioned - how much to keep other non-cataloguing staff up to date with RDA. I've mentioned it briefly at department meetings, but I am not sure exactly what other information they might *need* to know (as against a general awareness). I'd be interested to hear what others have shared with non-cataloguing staff.



Nicky



-----Original Message-----

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Clifford, Katrina M

Sent: 13 January 2014 11:20

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Who was/is involved in the decision/preparation? Did you have to justify it to senior managers



Myself and my boss raised RDA at a departmental meeting fairly early on, before we even had a date to move. It was all built into our strategic planning for the team and the wider department, with the need for time and money for training accepted as necessary.



In terms of planning I'd say myself and the head of Collections worked closely on it, involving the systems staff where needed. We kept RDA as a running item on our team planning meetings to keep the rest of the team up to date.



Katrina



Katrina Clifford



Ext: 62118

[log in to unmask]







-----Original Message-----

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Williams

Sent: 13 January 2014 11:01

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Who was/is involved in the decision/preparation? Did you have to justify it to senior managers



Sorry, I'm re-sending this with the question in the subject field so that it's easier to follow.

Helen



-----Original Message-----

From: Williams,HK

Sent: 13 January 2014 11:00

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: RE: RDA at Wellcome



Thanks June



You mentioning needing the approval of Senior Management leads nicely into another question for our session this morning, which is Who was involved in the decision/preparation for implementing RDA?

Did you have to 'justify' it to senior managers?



A few people have already mentioned that the cost of the toolkit has been a prohibitive factor, and this follows on from that a bit as well.



Helen



-----Original Message-----

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tomlinson, June

Sent: 13 January 2014 10:33

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] RDA at Wellcome



Good morning everyone.



At Wellcome we have been downloading RDA records for a while but haven't yet done any original cataloguing in RDA. Where records are available as either AACR2 or RDA we would take the RDA record but if the AACR2 one looks better we would take that instead. We don't convert AACR2 records to RDA.



I had planned to implement RDA fully this Spring but the preparation is proving to be quite overwhelming as we have so many other projects going on. I also have to get the approval of our Senior Management Team before anything can, officially, happen.



June





June Tomlinson

Cataloguing and Metadata Services Manager - Collection Management & Operations Wellcome Library

215 Euston Road

London NW1 2BE

Telephone: +44 (0)20 7611 8493

Fax: +44 (0)20 7611 8703

E-mail [log in to unmask]

www.wellcome.ac.uk

The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183.

Its sole Trustee is The Wellcome Trust Limited, a company registered in England, no. 2711000, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE.



From June 2013 - September 2014, the Wellcome Library is undergoing major changes as part of the Wellcome Collection Development Project.  We will be open for business, but there will be disruptions to services and some Library areas will be temporarily closed.



If you're planning to visit the Library over the coming months, please check for updates on the Library blog<http://wellcomelibrary.org/about-us/projects/development-plan/>, where the most up-to-date information will be posted.











This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Email Security - www.websense.com



Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System.



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System.



________________________________



This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and/or its attachments you must not take any action based upon them and you must not copy or show them to anyone. Please send the email back to us and immediately and permanently delete it and its attachments.



Where this email is unrelated to the business of University of the Arts London or of any of its group companies the opinions expressed in it are the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of University of the Arts London (or the relevant group company).



Where the sender’s signature indicates that the email is sent on behalf of London Artscom Limited the following also applies: London Artscom Limited is a company registered in England and Wales under company number 02361261. Registered Office: University of the Arts London, 272 High Holborn, London WC1V 7EY.