Aloha,
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:10:09 -0800, Leon Marvell
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> An interesting question from an iconological point of view.
>
> What would constitute an "historically accurate" image of Satan? b
Here, for those who may be curious, is a little more from Slate Magazine
about this
proposed monument and some of the thinking of the Satanic Temple folks who
devised it. To be both not silly and kid friendly (it may be that one can
sit in
Baphomet's lap, for instance).
Iconographically, I am a little puzzled by the third, not-so-goatish, horn.
And, of course, by the First Amendment disputes that grow back like
weeds...
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/01/10/satanic_temple_monument_at_oklahoma_capitol_building_interview_with_temple.html
Musing Discouraged On The Courthouse Lawn, But Thrilled To At The Theme
Park! Rose,
Pitch
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|