On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, Tim Jenness wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Peter W. Draper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, GitHub wrote:
>
> Subject: [Starlink/starlink] 1d5f78: hds: Put PWD on SUN/92 and also update
> stardocvers...
>
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Home: https://github.com/Starlink/starlink
> Commit: 1d5f787e587bcff1758a6c38ac9eb8564c20d3e4
>
> https://github.com/Starlink/starlink/commit/1d5f787e587bcff1758a6c38ac9eb8564c20d3e4
> Author: Tim Jenness <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2013-12-05 (Thu, 05 Dec 2013)
>
> Changed paths:
> M libraries/hds/sun92.tex
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> hds: Put PWD on SUN/92 and also update stardocversion
>
>
> Err, thanks. Shouldn't you and Brian also be mentioned in that case?
>
>
> I was wondering. In the sense of people writing code versus people
> editing the document then yes.
If these are to become the only external point of reference then naming
directly contributing authors would seem fair, but clearly that might
become more exhausting than informative if taken too far...
> I'll add us.
>
> I have to get all the authorships done before I upload the index to ADS --- they don't want to get a new entry
> each time a SUN is updated so I'm going for maximal author lists but the most recent date. By "maximal" I also
> mean that I include people who wrote SUN/xxx.1 even if SUN/xxx.20 has a different author (assuming it's the same
> package). The latex SUN is a prime example. We aren't tracking the sub number of the document so need to include
> all the authors.
>
> --
> Tim Jenness
>
>
>
--
Peter W. Draper, http://astro.dur.ac.uk/~pdraper
|