JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  December 2013

MCG December 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: IPTC writing software

From:

HARRIS TONY <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:06:29 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (250 lines)

Dear Trevor,
I'd say yes, it will take extra time, but without metadata digital images are meaningless bits and bytes of data. You can batch enter at least basic copyright metadata simply using something like Adobe Bridge. 

But as we saw at last week's CT DAM conference images extracted for the web if they leave via a DAM can have metadata embedded automatically, and if your DAM talks to your CMS you can have collection data embedded too, so over the next few years I'd argue that there will be no excuse not to. 

I am working on a small digitisation project of a photo archive, metadata has been at the heart of the project as IPTC is the place to capture all the data that exists in the photo albums, and yes it did slow down the project initially whilst the metadata schema was worked out. It will add extra work during the lifetime of the project but without metadata the images will become meaningless scans of old photos nobody can remember anything about because you can't write on the back of a digital image.

Tony
Government Art Collection



-----Original Message-----
From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Reynolds, Trevor
Sent: 02 December 2013 10:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MCG] IPTC writing software

 
Hi Sarah

The problem I find with embedding metadata in images is that is a massive consumer of peoples time.  Date and time taken is OK with digital cameras (provided someone has made sure they are correct when they start using the camera).  With scanned analogue photos editing the date and time so that it isn't the date and time the photo was scanned almost never happens.  Adding additional information involves using user un-friendly software and retyping or cut and pasting information one image at a time.

Does any one know of  a simple (i.e. usable by people whos computer skills are pretty much limited to basic word processing and spreadsheet use) programme for adding metadata to images?  Especially useful would be one that would take a spreadsheet of image file names and paths and write the remaining columns to the images metadata?

Trevor Reynolds
Collections Registrar, English Heritage
tel: +44 (0) 1904 601905.  37 Tanner Row, York, YO1 6WP

-----Original Message-----
From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Saunders
Sent: 29 November 2013 19:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MCG] Online image size guidelines?

The first step to engagement is for the user to know who they should be engaging with.  I understand why museums want to make their images available, but it is even more important to embed some attribution.  Some (limited) data can be read in system browsers and there will be more utilities to make visible embedded data in future. If Public Catalogue Foundation, National Gallery of Art and Rijks Museum can do it, why not everyone else? 

(well, the first step is the will do do it!)

And can I make a plea for IPTC Extension, which enables you to list the artwork and connected details unambiguously. I recommend using the individual fields and concatenating relevant key data also into the Description fields where it can be picked up more widely. 

Sarah 



On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:58, Gillespie, David wrote:

> To be honest putting images is like trying to determine what length is a piece of string.
> 
> However, by putting up images online you do open yourself up to people using that image. You can use DMCA notifications to get links or pages taken down but it really is not worth it in the end. One it could be wasteful having someone filing out DMCA's all day but it could also be bad for publicity especially if you are chasing down some blogger. There is also the issue of copyright and fair use dealings etc.  but I introduce you to the Streisand effect in case you feel the need to chase people down for images.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
> 
> Unless you feel whoever is using your image (it's not stealing it, it will be either a replication or copyright infringement) for malicious intentions or trying to monetise your images, engage with them! It could bring new audiences to your museum and allow you to connect with them, content generation etc. Leading yourself to present information that is relevant to your intended audience bringing them back again and again.
> 
> Sorry for the rant, I am dealing with this issue but with 3D models and it all seem to boil down IP control and the piracy issue. If you wish to expand your images online then do so, but by providing good resolution images (i.e. 1280 *720) and a service that people wish to use you shouldn't need to worry too much about piracy. Doing it badly on the other hand may have the reverse effect and actually drive people away from your site.
> 
> If you have any questions please contact me
> 
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 
> Mike Ellis
> Sent: 29 November 2013 14:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Online image size guidelines?
> 
> I'd personally rather museums didn't bother putting any images online at all rather than teeeeeny ones (which you can't see) or watermarked ones (which you can't see)..
> 
> 
> 
> But: If you *have* to do the "find people 'stealing' my image" thing then TinEye is good...
> 
> https://www.tineye.com/search/4d0d7d110488ce004acd0395c5347af758329fe7
> /
> 
> Ultimately tho, I'm with Tony - what can you really *do* if someone is using something of yours..? And how much might it cost in legal fees and staff time to chase your image around the web...?
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________
> 
> 
> Mike Ellis
> 
> We do nice web stuff: http://thirty8.co.uk (http://thirty8.co.uk/)
> 
> * My book: http://heritageweb.co.uk (http://heritageweb.co.uk/) *
> 
> 
> On Friday, 29 November 2013 at 13:34, HARRIS TONY wrote:
> 
>> Hi Sarah,
>> I've not much to add on image size to what has already been covered. As for metadata if you can embed it do it, of course it can be erased, but at least you have done it.
>> 
>> You mentioned security, this can mean using a service like digimarc (http://www.digimarc.com/) or similar. This however, has always to me seemed to me to be a blind alley, because for it to be effective you would need to pay their annual fee and then have the resources available to pay a lawyer to chase down the offender in the particular jurisdiction concerned, this could be anywhere.
>> 
>> The digimarc pricing can be found here.
>> http://www.digimarc.com/docs/discover-resources/dmrc-osp-price-sheet.
>> pdf
>> 
>> The issue is that once they are online, that's it, they are out there, you can write to the person concerned and request that they remove an image, that is about all you can do (lawyer route excepted). There is an old (in internet years) adage, 'If you want real security don't put them online'.
>> 
>> I'd be interested to know of anyone on the list that is using watermarking these days.
>> 
>> Tony Harris
>> New Media Officer & Photographer
>> Government Art Collection
>> tony.harris @culture.gsi.gov.uk | 020 7580 9123
>> @govartcol   /governmentartcollection | www.gac.culture.gov.uk (http://www.gac.culture.gov.uk)
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of 
>> Sarah McHugh
>> Sent: 27 November 2013 12:36
>> To: [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask])
>> Subject: [MCG] Online image size guidelines?
>> 
>> Is there any advice or set of guidelines about the size and quality of online museum artefact images or online artwork images?
>> 
>> Also any advice on image watermarking or embedding IPTC data into images such as copyright owner, contact details, credit etc?
>> 
>> In the past we have always made sure our images are small size 300 pixels at longest edge and 72 dpi. We'd like to make our online images larger but would like to know of any security settings we should be using.
>> 
>> 
>> Any advice or direction would be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> ****************************************************************
>> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
>> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
>> ****************************************************************
>> 
>> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
>> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>> 
>> *********************************************************************
>> ******* This email and its contents are the property of the 
>> Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
>> If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it.
>> All DCMS e-mail is recorded and stored for a minimum of 6 months
>> 
>> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
>> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>> 
>> 
>> ****************************************************************
>> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
>> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
>> ****************************************************************
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ****************************************************************
>       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
> David Gillespie
> Research Student
> National Museums Liverpool
> Tel: 0151 478 4727
> Fax: 01512365105
> 
> www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk
> 
> Gift ideas and treats for yourself in our online 
> shop.<www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/onlineshop>
> 
> 
> National Museums Liverpool Disclaimer:
> 
> 
> This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed, and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright. If you have received this email and you are not the intended recipient please notify [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> and delete this email and you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this email are strictly prohibited.
> 
> This email does not conclude a binding agreement. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of National Museums Liverpool.
> 
> Although National Museums Liverpool routinely screens for viruses, recipients should scan this email and any attachments for viruses. National Museums Liverpool makes no representation or warranty that this email or any of its attachments are free of viruses or defects and does not accept any responsibility for any damage caused by any virus or defect transmitted by this email.
> 
> As part of conducting its business, National Museums Liverpool may monitor and record emails and their contents passing through their network under the Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practices) and (Interception of Communications) Regulations 2000.
> 
> [http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/images/sitewide/nml-logo.gif]
> 
> National Museums Liverpool, Information Systems, 127 Dale Street, 
> Liverpool, L2 2JH, GB
> 
> ****************************************************************
>       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************

Electric Lane
Consultancy and Training in Image Archiving and DAM
+44(0)7941316714
+44(0)207607 1415
[log in to unmask]
www.electriclane.co.uk


****************************************************************
       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.

Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage Collection; have a look and tell us what you think. 
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/

****************************************************************
       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. 
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

****************************************************************************
This email and its contents are the property of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it.
All DCMS e-mail is recorded and stored for a minimum of 6 months

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

****************************************************************
       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager