JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM Archives

HERFORUM Archives


HERFORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM Home

HERFORUM  November 2013

HERFORUM November 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks

From:

"Winfield, Hugh" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Issues related to Historic Environment Records <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:17:18 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Sue,



The problem that I would have with that option is that our executive are very reluctant to accept reports on single issue or day-to-day maters, which is how this would be viewed, especially on something that could be considered to be a "policy". Conversely putting requirements into something with a wider remit like our draft heritage strategy or the new Local Plan is comparatively easy. It will all depend on the democratic structure of each particular council as they each have their idiosyncrasies, and my wording could be adapted to allow each HER to easily meet the basic requirement no mater how their unitary/districts run.



But I think you're right that the method is not really the issue and that the important thing is to get the actual concept/aim of the benchmark right.



Hugh



________________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Sue Whitehouse [[log in to unmask]]

Sent: 07 November 2013 15:42

To: Winfield, Hugh

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks



Surely the basic benchmark is just to getting the HER adopted by resolution of the council (any council that uses the record for planning purposes) which can be done with a straight forward report to the executive. Noting the definition of a site of archaeological interest in the GPDO is one being within a site registered in any record adopted by resolution and known as the County Sites and Monuments Record. Of course the wording in the GPDO is out of date!



This does not have to be done in the context of any other kind of plan or document so not dependent on anything or anyone else.  Mention in the context of a development plan or any other kind of planning document or heritage strategy produced by any tier of local government for whatever purpose  is desirable  maybe but not strictly necessary. I would hope most HERs will have therefore achieved the basic benchmark anyway? One less to worry about. Things need to be simplified and streamlined at the moment.



Sue



Sue Whitehouse

Historic Environment Officer, Education & Enterprise

Tel. Office: 01902 555617



E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Wolverhampton City Council







From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Winfield, Hugh

Sent: 07 November 2013 14:33

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks



Sarah,



I think that tightening up the text, ditching some, adding others and perhaps splitting some benchmarks off into a separate section (perhaps aimed at "County" level teams?) would deal with it nicely. For example 4.1 is currently:



i. Resolution of governing body to adopt the Record formally, in accordance with the 'Benchmark' Scheme.

ii. Where the governing body is not the local planning authority (lpa), or acts on behalf of one or more local authorities, formal recognition of the Record is desirable from the relevant lpas. This might, for example, be incorporated in service level agreements.



I would suggest that something similar to the following would be an appropriate alternative:





a. A formal statement within a Local Plan (or equivalent) committing the appropriate Local Planning Authority(s) to maintain and enhance the Historic Environment Record.



b. Formal adoption of the Historic Environment Record, and a commitment to maintain and enhance the record in line with national and local frameworks and strategies, through the publication of a Supplementary Planning Document (or equivalent) which has been through public consultation. Adoption should be at Cabinet level or above in each local authority that the record covers.



I would think that most of us have reached level "a" but would like to get to "b" if we had the backing and resources. The documents needed for "b" could include optimum and minimum staffing levels, required resources, forward plans etc set out in a strategy or similar.



Hugh



Hugh Winfield | Archaeologist |

North East Lincolnshire Regeneration Partnership | Origin 1, Europarc, Grimsby, DN37 9TZ

W 01472323586 | M 07825125964





________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of MacLean, Sarah

Sent: 07 November 2013 13:56

To: Winfield, Hugh

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks

Dear all,



Interpretation of the text is a very valid point.



Thinking about Benchmarks in general, rather than specifically about the current draft Benchmarks, how would you propose resolving this issue? Is it about the wording of the benchmarks? Is it about how they are measured against? Is it about having Benchmarks at all? - case studies have been suggested as an alternative. Or could is it something else entirely?



all the best



Sarah



Sarah MacLean

Heritage Information Partnerships Supervisor

English Heritage



________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Webster

Sent: 05 November 2013 11:01

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks

I think Hugh's compliance list sums up neatly the problem with the current benchmarks - the answer to most is 'it depends what you mean by ...'





Chris Webster

Historic Environment Record

Somerset County Council

Somerset Heritage Centre

Brunel Way

Taunton

TA2 6SF



01823 347434



Online HER: www.somerset.gov.uk/her<http://www.somerset.gov.uk/her>





________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Winfield, Hugh

Sent: 04 November 2013 15:39

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks

I didn't realise that I came across so negatively until I read Sarah's summaries! Apologies to all, I will try to be more positive and upbeat....



After a few minutes thought, here is the Level one compliance breakdown for North East Lincs:



1.1 - Mostly (on web page, will probably fill in the blanks at next update, it used to be up there but I guess I got carried away during a previous rewrite)

1.2 - Mostly (see above)

1.3 - No (planning application consultations recorded, and pre-apps and utilities, but not other consultations/users, partly so I don't have to think too hard about the DPA but also to save time)

1.4 - No (unlikely to be achievable)

2.1 - No (but a statement could easily be put on the web page)

2.2 - Yes (I think)

2.3 - Yes

3.1 - No

3.2 - Yes (I think, if I'm right in assuming that by using HBSMR you are effectively forced to be MIDAS compliant by the structure of the database - assuming it is used correctly)

3.3 - Don't know

3.4 - No (pointless given small size of reference collection)

3.5 - Probably (would need to ask IT)

3.6 - No

3.7 - No (I don't really have a backlog, and all records were recast between 2005 and 2010, so I'm mostly left with enhancements some of which have forward plans)

3.8 - No (unless writing "Panic" in big red letters on a page of A4 counts)

4.1 - Yes (record is specified in Council's contract with Balfour Beatty and is to be included as an evidence base for the local plan)

4.2 - Yes (sort of, the Council still owns the HER but the contract states that it is to be administered by Balfour Beatty Workplace)

4.3 - No (who would adopt them? who is meant to adopt them? Do they get a cuddly toy?)

4.4 - No (although the Conservation Officer and myself have had a draft "Strategy" for a couple of years)

4.5 - No (only 0.8 FTE, although I'm not sure which 20% of me isn't being employed)

4.6 - No (pointless as only 1 member of staff, it wouldn't be so much of a tree as a stump or maybe a rock)

4.7 - Yes

4.8 - No



So a grand total of 9/23 when I get around to re-writing my web pages!



Hugh Winfield | Archaeologist |

North East Lincolnshire Regeneration Partnership | Origin 1, Europarc, Grimsby, DN37 9TZ

W 01472323586 | M 07825125964



________________________________

From: Issues related to Historic Environment Records [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Wells (Archaeology)

Sent: 04 November 2013 12:25

To: Winfield, Hugh

Subject: Re: B&A2013 - How do we measure ourselves against the Benchmarks

Hi all,



>Mike Shaw queried whether anyone currently meets Level 1 or Level 2 Benchmarks. Can anyone



>respond to this?



A comprehensive no to this – not even close to stage 1!  ☹



Helen Wells

Historic Environment Record Officer

Leicestershire County Council

Planning, Historic & Natural Environment, Leicestershire County Council, County Hall, Glenfield, Leics, LE3 8RA

Telephone: 0116 3058323 / E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>







_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any reading, printing, storage, disclosure, copying or any other action taken in respect of this e-mail is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by using the reply function and then permanently delete what you have received.



Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance with Leicestershire County Council's policy on the use of electronic communications. The contents of e-mails may have to be disclosed to a request under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000.



The views expressed by the author may not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Leicestershire County Council.



Attachments to e-mail messages may contain viruses that may damage your system. Whilst Leicestershire County Council has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept any liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of these factors. You are advised to carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.











------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





P Reduce your environmental footprint, please do not print this

email unless you really need to.















This electronic message contains information from North East Lincolnshire Council

which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for

the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended

recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the

contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this

electronic message in error, please telephone or email the number(s) or address

above immediately. Activity and use of the North East Lincolnshire email system

is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business

purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be

recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.

Scanned by Anti Virus Software









This email, and any attachments is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain personal and / or sensitive material and should be handled according to the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998. If this email carries a protective marking of PROTECT or RESTRICTED in the header it should be handled according to HMG guidelines, if not protectively marked it can be regarded as UNCLASSIFIED.



If this Email has been misdirected, please notify the author immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information contained in it or attached, and all copies must be deleted immediately.



Whilst we take reasonable steps to try to identify any software viruses, any attachments to this email may nevertheless contain viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to identify.  You should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before opening any documents.  Somerset County Council will not accept any liability for damage caused by computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document supplied with this email.



All GCSx traffic may be subject to recording and / or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.



This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.



Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage Collection; have a look and tell us what you think.

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/











------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





P Reduce your environmental footprint, please do not print this

email unless you really need to.















This electronic message contains information from North East Lincolnshire Council

which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for

the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended

recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the

contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this

electronic message in error, please telephone or email the number(s) or address

above immediately. Activity and use of the North East Lincolnshire email system

is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business

purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be

recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.

Scanned by Anti Virus Software











---------------------------------------------------------------------

DISCLAIMER: This email and any enclosures are intended solely for the use of the named recipient. If this email has a protective marking of PROTECT or RESTRICT in its title or contents, the information within must be subject to appropriate safeguards to protect against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against accidental loss or destruction or damage. PROTECT and RESTRICTED information should only be further shared where there is a legitimate need.

If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, distribute or use it without the authorisation of Wolverhampton City Council. If you have received this email in error please notify us by email to [log in to unmask] and then delete it and any attachments accompanying it.

Please note that Wolverhampton City Council do not guarantee that this message or attachments are virus free or reach you in their original form and accept no liability arising from this. Any views or opinions expressed within this email are those of the writer and may not necessarily reflect those of Wolverhampton City Council. No contractual commitment is intended to arise from this email or attachments.

---------------------------------------------------------------------




<html>
<p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><span
style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Webdings;mso-bidi-font-family:Webdings;
color:green'>P </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:green'>Reduce your environmental footprint, please do not print this
email unless you really need to. </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none'><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>This electronic message contains information from North East Lincolnshire Council
which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this
electronic message in error, please telephone or email the number(s) or address
above immediately. Activity and use of the North East Lincolnshire email system
is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business
purposes. Communications using this system will also be monitored and may be
recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
Scanned by Anti Virus Software</span></p>
</html>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager