Hi,
On Nov 27, 2013, at 02:14 , Van Snyder <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We should decide what we want to happen, perhaps by consulting the IEEE
> standard or the P754 committee, and say so. Since the next standard is
> presumably almost done, maybe that's a better place to do it than with
> the interp mechanism. Add an item to the "new stuff" list in the
> introduction that says "this used to be ambiguous and now it's not.”
No need for a new work item, since there's already a “reckon what to do
with 754(2008)” item. This easily fits.
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
|