NA48 did morph into NA62 and Glasgow is the site involved.
Enmr is supported at the Tier-1 and is known about and approved by the PMB although it may not have been explicitly recorded in the minutes.
Cheers Pete
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Gronbech GridPP Project Manager Tel No. : 01865 273389
Fax No. : 01865 273418
Department of Particle Physics,
University of Oxford,
Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Jones
> Sent: 07 October 2013 16:10
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NGS VO No Longer Approved
>
> Jeremy,
>
> In addition to landslides (which is an excellent name for a VO, BTW.
> Which politician would not fund it?) I have a few more weird entries in
> Approved VOs which are worth mentioning:
>
> CEDAR - not in the CIC Portal
> ENMR.EU - not in the CIC Portal
> NA48 - not in the CIC Portal
>
> Perhaps NA48 has morphed into NA62, but who knows for sure? As for the
> others, I don't know. Any suggestions on whether any of this is cruft now?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On 10/07/2013 12:46 PM, Jeremy Coles wrote:
> > Hi Kashif,
> >
> > We can go through them at the ops meeting tomorrow.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:43, Kashif Mohammad wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jeremy
> >>
> >> Can you give the list of the VO's which are no longer to be supported even
> if the list is provisional. We are moving to SL6 and it will be appropriate time
> to remove it from configuration.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Kashif
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> >>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Coles
> >>> Sent: 07 October 2013 11:40
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: NGS VO No Longer Approved
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Steve,
> >>>
> >>> I have been following up on a batch of VOs that we no longer need to
> >>> support and several that are to be 'decommissioned'. For the latter
> >>> there is a formal process we need to invoke (which includes things like
> >>> removal from the portal and GGUS). The NGS one is not entwined in
> these
> >>> structures but ngs.ac.uk is in there and different!
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Jeremy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:23, Stephen Jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> All sites,
> >>>>
> >>>> The NGS VO is no longer an approved VO. Please see below for the
> >>> implications of this change.
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Steve
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>> Hi John,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/04/2013 03:51 PM, John Kewley wrote:
> >>>>> What is the next step needed so sites update to reflect what is in
> >>> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/GridPP_approved_VOs ?
> >>>> Aside: unless I'm wrong, if a VO ceases to exist, there is no "harm"
> >>> leaving support in place at a site, because no jobs would arrive
> >>> anyway. Pls advise whether true or false?
> >>>> With respect to your question, the contract is this:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) Approved VOs maintain their current config in the Operations
> >>> Portal.
> >>>> b) We (OK, I!) keep the approved VOs wiki up to date whenever
> >>> broadcasts are received from the Operations Portal or the VOs
> >>> concerned. It will be synch'd roughly once a week in any case.
> >>>> https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/GridPP_approved_VOs
> >>>>
> >>>> c) We send out a TB_SUPPORT notification if significant changes occur
> >>> to Approved VOs.
> >>>> d) That each site is responsible for ensuring that its VO config is
> >>> consistent with the Approved VOs table or Operations Portal. Several
> >>> methods are available to do this including a tar ball
> >>> (http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/VomsSnooper/glitecfg.tar), VomsSnooper
> >>> (https://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/VomsSnooper_Tools) or even by hand.
> >>>> If a site is not consistent with the Approved VOs, then something in
> >>> this contract has gone wrong. In this case, I suspect that I changed
> >>> Approved VOs to remove NGS but may may not have sent an alert, so I'll
> >>> send another.
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Steve
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> >>>> System Administrator office: 220
> >>>> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> >>>> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794
> >>> 2334
> >>>> University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> >>>> System Administrator office: 220
> >>>> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> >>>> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794
> >>> 2334
> >>>> University of Liverpool
> >>> http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
>
>
> --
> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> System Administrator office: 220
> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794 2334
> University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
|