Subject: | | AW: [ccp4bb] Problematic PDBs |
From: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 10 Oct 2013 22:44:34 +0000564_us-ascii Please tell me why Rpim should be looked at. Cannot one have meaningless data and have lots of multiplicity to drive Rpim lower without any real benefit? Under what conditions is Rpim useful? And suppose one looks at (and not /) and CC1/2. What of it? And let me write what Phil wrote in a slightly different way: Please explain how you think that adding the resolution from 2.6 A to 2.45 A will improve your model. Sorry, but maybe it is too soon after the last CC1/2 discussion to raise these points, but I am truly interested in [...][log in to unmask] |
Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > I have a structure at 2.45A which has been well refined. However, since > the R-merge at the last shell is above 1 (although I/sigmaI at the last > shell is more than 2), we now decide to cut back the resolution to about > 2.6A. Is there a way to do this based on the well-refined model instead [...][log in to unmask] |
Date: | | Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:16:55 +0000 |
Content-Type: | | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|