No claim has been made regarding the suffix. See message.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Sep 2013, at 16:57, Jeremy Harte <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Could anyone who has Kitson & James to hand summarise their strong case that river-names in -erno don't take words for 'tree' as qualifiers?
>
> Jeremy Harte
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The English Place-Name List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guto Rhys
> Sent: 13 September 2013 16:31
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: thanks for response on Pensax/Sixpenny names - Pimperne DOR
>
> Thanks. This is the entry that was being referred to.
>
> W 'yw' seems to be a possibility even though there are objections. See previous message. I suspect that there may be alternative possibilities, PIE *piwo- ?? I may have time to do some brief research into the relevant literature tmrw.
>
> Bear in mind that Ekwall is 'of his time' and much progress has been made in the field in the 85 years since the publication of ERN.
>
> Have you verified the 'yw' names noted by Ekwall with BLITON and later studies?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> The information contained in this message is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s).
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> use, dissemination, or reproduction is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
> Visit the Epsom and Ewell Borough Council website at www.epsom-ewell.gov.uk
> ********************************************************************
|