On 5 Aug 2013, at 15:31, Mike Richardson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:28:26PM +0100, Scott Armitage wrote:
>>
>> On 5 Aug 2013, at 15:19, Tim Chown <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Aug 2013, at 15:10, Alan Buxey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> and IIRC, Dot11Radio0Edu and Dot11Radio1Edu are the bridge
>>>> interface descriptions for 'eduroam' SSID that was present.
>>>> which at 92 clients almost beat all the other non-open SSIDs
>>>>
>>>> (had this been DefCon you wouldnt have seen as many clients
>>>> using the open SSID!! ;-) )
>>>
>>> Historically attendees simply use the open ietf SSID. Remember eduroam is new ot the IETF community in general, and most are not from eduroam sites. Hence 80% plus just use the open option. I also had to do so last week as the eduroam association was timing out so I bumped the ietf SSID to be higher priority on my MBP.
>>>
>>> It was good to see an IPv6-only/NAT64 test SSID. Can we arrange for Networkshop to try that next Easter?
>>
>>
>> that would be an interesting idea. A test SSID with IPv6 only and some NAT64 / DNS64
>
> And just to tie two threads together, and for fun, could it be 5Ghz only?
> :-)
Now you just need a way to feature Moonshot...
But in all seriousness, happy to help on it. It would be good to expose the Networkshop community to it. At the IETF bits and bites there was a NAT64 demo with an A10 device. We could see if they'd be willing to provide something here too? Otherwise there's open source code, or open NAT64 services like A&A.
Tim
|