Bernard, Antoine,
That was my mistake. As per the news item of July 17:
RDF representations of Collection Description vocabularies updated
2013-07-17. The RDF representations of the vocabularies created in 2007 to
support the Dublin Core Collections Application Profile [1] have been
updated. The Accrual Method [2], Accrual Policy [3], and Frequency [4]
vocabularies are now declared as SKOS Concept Schemes. These vocabularies
(and their PURLs), along with Collection Description Terms [5] and the
Collection Description Type vocabulary [6], fall under DCMI's policy for
the persistence of formal documents and machine-readable schemas published
on the DCMI website [7].
[1] http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/collection-application-profile/
[2] http://purl.org/cld/accmeth/
[3] http://purl.org/cld/accpol/
[4] http://purl.org/cld/freq/
[5] http://purl.org/cld/terms/
[6] http://purl.org/cld/cdtype/
[7] http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/publications/
the Collections vocabularies were recently updated. All of the PURLs resolve
correctly to the updated schemas _except_ for [6] http://purl.org/cld/cdtype/,
which resolves to the 2007 schema, with its reference to a non-existent dcrdf
namespace. This error will be fixed with the next Web build, probably in the
next day or two.
Sorry for the confusion!
Tom
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:52:22PM +0200, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> Thanks for following this in the heart of August!
>
> We have the same kind of persistence policy in LOV, even if not written as
> formallly as DCMI's is.
> That's why, despite Antoine's recommendation to hold my breadth, I've added
> cld and cdtype to LOV
>
> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_cld.html
> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_cdtype.html
>
> ... even if they are stored there "for the record" and not really used
> anywhere. Note that another policy of LOV is to stick to "element sets" (in
> DC local parlance), hence "value vocabularies" aka Concept Schemes such as
> http://purl.org/cld/accmeth/ will not be included.
>
> FYI namespaces such as http://purl.org/dc/rdf/ are stored in the LOV
> back-office as being referenced by recorded vocabularies but not resolved.
> Whenever it resolves to something, we'll see if this something is a
> vocabulary suitable for insertion in LOV or not.
>
> Bernard
>
>
>
> 2013/8/6 Stuart Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > Antoine & Bernard:
> >
> > The DCMI Task Group that developed the Collection AP is no longer active.
> > However, the related schemas are being maintained by DCMI under its policy
> > for the persistence of formal documents and machine-readable schemas. We
> > made a recent technical update announcement about the vocabularies at [1].
> > We'll check out the problem link.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > [1] http://dublincore.org/news/2013/#dcmi-news-20130717-02
> >
> > Stuart A. Sutton,
> > Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Washington
> > Information School
> > http://ischool.uw.edu/
> > Managing Director, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI)
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> > Skype: sasutton
> > *DCMI - a project of ASIS&T*
> > * *http://dublincore.org*
> > *
> > https://www.asis.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Antoine Isaac <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Bernard,
> >>
> >> On the vocabulary list Diane mentioned that this Collection AP may not be
> >> very active any more, so maybe it's better to hold your breath and wait
> >> till it has been discussed in three weeks...
> >>
> >> Antoine
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>>
> >>> I am currently adding to LOV Dublin Core Collections Application Profile
> >>> vocabularies, namely
> >>> http://purl.org/cld/terms/ and http://purl.org/cld/cdtype/
> >>> The later relies on a dcrdf namespace http://purl.org/dc/rdf/
> >>> Unfortunately this URI is 404.
> >>> Where can I find the definition of elements in this namespace?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your attention
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Bernard Vatant
> >>> *
> >>> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> >>> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> >>> Skype : bernard.vatant
> >>> Blog : the wheel and the hub <http://bvatant.blogspot.com>
> >>> Linked Open Vocabularies : lov.okfn.org <http://lov.okfn.org>
> >>> ------------------------------**--------------------------
> >>> *Mondeca*****
> >>> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> >>> www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/>
> >>> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/**
> >>> mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>>
> >>> ------------------------------**----------------------------
> >>> Mondeca is co-chairing
> >>> Long-term Preservation and Governance of RDF Vocabularies <
> >>> http://dcevents.dublincore.**org/IntConf/index/pages/view/**vocPres<http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/index/pages/view/vocPres>
> >>> >
> >>> at Dublin Core Conference
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
> --
> *Bernard Vatant
> *
> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> Skype : bernard.vatant
> Blog : the wheel and the hub <http://bvatant.blogspot.com>
> Linked Open Vocabularies : lov.okfn.org
> --------------------------------------------------------
> *Mondeca** ** *
> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> www.mondeca.com
> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Mondeca is co-chairing
> Long-term Preservation and Governance of RDF
> Vocabularies<http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/index/pages/view/vocPres>
> at Dublin Core Conference
--
Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|