Hi Peter,
In my opinion, you should use what the evidence says is most accurate
and the mathematics says is most correct.
Evidence: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811908012974
Mathematics (not for the faint hearted):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8H_v6njHmw
In SPM-land in general though, people use whatever other people use,
has the nicest user interface, works fastest, and deals with their
particular data format.
Best regards,
-John
On 18 July 2013 13:50, Peter Lundberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear SPM-landers,
>
> It was suggested to us that spatial normalization with affine transformation is an obsolete method, and that we definitely should use an alternative method instead. What are your insightful comments?
>
> 73, Peter
>
> University of Linköping and University Hospital of Linköping
> Peter Lundberg, PhD, Professor
> Radiation Physics and CMIV
> S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
> Mail [log in to unmask]
> Ph +46-(0)10 - 103 2790
>
> On MR-Education http://edunmrsoft.wordpress.com/
|