Please remove me from this list, regards Geraldine
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Jul 2013, at 18:44, PSYCH-POSTGRADS automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> There are 35 messages totaling 10049 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics in this special issue:
>
> 1. 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher (32)
> 2. Mailing list use
> 3. Psychology demonstrator
> 4. Students at the University of Reading
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:46:45 +0100
> From: Aine Ito <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
> completion test.
>
> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
> to take part.
>
> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>
> Please click the link below to participate.
>
> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Aine Ito
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:53:10 +0100
> From: "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
> completion test.
>
> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
> to take part.
>
> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>
> Please click the link below to participate.
>
> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Aine Ito
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:44:50 +0100
> From: "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:00:51 +0000
> From: "L.R.Saunders" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Dear Aine
> If you are conducting research ethically, the BPS/APA (or other regulator) guidelines state that you need to provide a briefing note explaining the what the study involves, where you (the researcher) are from (e.g.which university or research centre) and your contact details so that people can contact you regarding your study. However, more cruically you must state whether your research has been ethically approved by your university/department and provide contacts details for the head of your ethics committee (such as email). This should be done in case a respondant has an ethical complaint or concern. If you are student you must provide your supervisors name and contact details as well. It is also a good idea to inform respondants what the data will be used for (e.g. part of a degree course or that you are conducting for a research company) - i'd suggest this statement be in the breifing note and the debreifing note. Another huge ethical concern I have with your study is that you have made it impossible for respondants to withdraw their data should they wish to do so.
>
> I am sure these oversights are an innocent mistake. However, since I cannot assess whether you are going to ensure my rights as a participant (see BPS or APAs codes of ethical conduct), since I cannot verify the ethical status of your research (no indication of whether your study has been through a stringent ethical examination by those on an ethical committee and no contacts for the ethical committee), since I don’t know the purpose of your study and what the data will be used for, your study could be in breach of your universities/research centre’s regulations as well as the BPS and APA regulations. I would therefore suggest that you attach a briefing/consent and debriefing form to your study before collecting more data. Make it clear to respondants that you have done the following:
> • Ensured that respondents can provide informed consent (i.e. know what they are agreeing to; what the research is, who is conducting, which university you are from)
> • Enable the anonymity of respondents and communicate this with respondants
> • Ensure that participants have the right to withdraw and that you can act upon such requests for withdrawing data
> • Ensure and communicate to respondents what the potential risks are to them (either physical or psychological)
>
> If you are unaware of ethical practice and what you must communicate to your respondents then I would seriously recommend reading the BPS or APA ethical guidelines or reading up on human research ethics in Psychology or Social Sciences. I am sure others on this list would agree with me?
>
> Lee
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 09:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:02:07 +0000
> From: "STOCKER R." <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Aine, I'm surprised your supervisors and your School ethics committee did not make this clear to you? (Did you get ethical approval?)
>
> Can I suggest that you take your survey down until these issues are resolved - as from a research viewpoint they are very serious.
>
> Rachel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:45
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:57:14 +0100
> From: "Hammond, Kate" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:14:04 +0100
> From: "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:27:00 +0100
> From: Kiera Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi all,
>
> If it's helpful, the BPS published some ethical guidelines for internet
> mediated research in 2007
>
> http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/conducting_research_on_the_internet-guidelines_for_ethical_practice_in_psychological_research_online.pdf
>
>
> Not sure if there's been an update since,
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Kiera
>
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 11:14, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>
>
>
> --
> Kiera Bartlett
>
> PhD Student
> Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Research Group
> School of Health and Related Research
> University of Sheffield
> S1 4DA
> Tel: 01142 222 975
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:26:37 +0100
> From: Jodie Butler <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt
> with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the
> student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:34:26 +0100
> From: "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:43:58 +0000
> From: "Meredith, Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi,
>
> For reference sake, I agree with Jodie - I also don't think any of us have the authority to contact people's supervisors - we are not a regulatory body and contacting them would be stepping outside of our remit (not that we have one per se). We have expressed, in strong terms, our concerns with the study as is and pointed Aine in the direction of BPS regulations, that is all we can (and should) do.
>
> Alex Meredith,
> Nottingham Trent University
>
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jodie Butler
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:45:46 +0000
> From: "LONG S. (444451)" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:10:38 +0100
> From: Gill Wall <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Wouldn't it be better for Aine to contact them herself?
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 11:14, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>
>
>
> --
> Gill Wall
> 07920402807
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:00:45 +0100
> From: Jodie Butler <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Thanks, I'm glad somebody else agrees. The student has messed up, they've
> been made aware of it. Absolutely no need to contact the supervisor and "alert
> them to training needs."
>
> At the very least, this should be a group for PhD/Grad students to support
> and help each other, not cause trouble for somebody when they've made a
> mistake. Contacting the supervisor goes against the spirit of this message
> board.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Meredith, Alexander <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> For reference sake, I agree with Jodie – I also don’t think any of us have
>> the authority to contact people’s supervisors – we are not a regulatory
>> body and contacting them would be stepping outside of our remit (not that
>> we have one per se). We have expressed, in strong terms, our concerns with
>> the study as is and pointed Aine in the direction of BPS regulations, that
>> is all we can (and should) do.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Meredith,
>>
>> Nottingham Trent University
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:
>> [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Jodie Butler
>> *Sent:* 01 July 2013 11:27
>>
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>>
>>
>> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt
>> with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the
>> student by contacting their supervisor?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may
>> contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended
>> addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In
>> this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and
>> information in this email that do not relate to the official business of
>> Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor
>> endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to
>> ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise
>> that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are
>> actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:10:13 +0000
> From: "STOCKER R." <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> It's a difficult one. It's clear that Aine has either had poor supervision OR has ignored/misunderstood her supervision guidance and ethics committee.
>
> However at the same time I would doubt that a doctoral psychology student could have come this far yet be in complete ignorance of the BPS ethical guidelines and imperatives for conducting research.
>
> It probably hasn't done much harm per se. It was mentioned during multiple-survey-invitations-gate (!) a few months back that we have responsibilities, as researchers, to follow ethical guidelines and conduct ourselves appropriately during research. Is there anything in the BPS guidelines about whistleblowing? (Genuine question!)
>
> Rachel
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Meredith, Alexander
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi,
>
> For reference sake, I agree with Jodie - I also don't think any of us have the authority to contact people's supervisors - we are not a regulatory body and contacting them would be stepping outside of our remit (not that we have one per se). We have expressed, in strong terms, our concerns with the study as is and pointed Aine in the direction of BPS regulations, that is all we can (and should) do.
>
> Alex Meredith,
> Nottingham Trent University
>
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jodie Butler
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:27
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:24:01 +0000
> From: "L.R.Saunders" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I think in this specific case we should exercise discretion here as many have already done. While I acknowledge that the student has made some, albeit potentially serious, mistakes. I do believe that the mistake was innocent and that the student will not make the same mistake again. The student has received advice and recommendations as to how to rectify the issues raised. I believe the student concerned would have learnt from this experience and I am glad that the student has shown good will by taking down the study and is taking the necessary steps to ensure that ethical practice is being followed. I personally feel that my concerns with the research are being satisfactorily dealt with and will not occur again. Therefore, in this case, I think we all should let this matter rest now. The problem is being dealt and the student has been given references and sources regarding ethical practice. I feel it unnecessary to contact the supervisors for the sole reason that the student has acknowledged the flaws and they are acting upon resolving them.
> Lee
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Gill Wall [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:10
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Wouldn't it be better for Aine to contact them herself?
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 11:14, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
>
>
> --
> Gill Wall
> 07920402807
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:27:28 +0100
> From: Sarah Pickup <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I very much agree with Lee here.
>
> Mistakes made and learned from, all part of the learning process I think.
>
> Sarah
>
> On 1 July 2013 12:24, L.R.Saunders <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> I think in this specific case we should exercise discretion here as many
>> have already done. While I acknowledge that the student has made some,
>> albeit potentially serious, mistakes. I do believe that the mistake was
>> innocent and that the student will not make the same mistake again. The
>> student has received advice and recommendations as to how to rectify the
>> issues raised. I believe the student concerned would have learnt from this
>> experience and I am glad that the student has shown good will by taking
>> down the study and is taking the necessary steps to ensure that ethical
>> practice is being followed. I personally feel that my concerns with the
>> research are being satisfactorily dealt with and will not occur again.
>> Therefore, in this case, I think we all should let this matter rest now.
>> The problem is being dealt and the student has been given references and
>> sources regarding ethical practice. I feel it unnecessary to contact the
>> supervisors for the sole reason that the student has acknowledged the flaws
>> and they are acting upon resolving them. ******
>>
>> Lee ****
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] on behalf of Gill Wall [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> *Sent:* 01 July 2013 11:10
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better for Aine to contact them herself?
>>
>>
>> On 1 July 2013 11:14, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>>> Kate
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>>> [log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>>> the very least.
>>>
>>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>>
>>> Aine
>>>
>>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>>
>>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>>> completion test.
>>>>
>>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>>> to take part.
>>>>
>>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>>
>>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>>
>>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Aine Ito
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>>> 038302).
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gill Wall
>> 07920402807
>
>
> --
> *Sarah Pickup
> PhD Researcher
> University of Sunderland*
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:30:18 +0100
> From: Sean Riley <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Nancy,
>
> Perhaps it would be more appropriate for Aine to discuss the issue herself rather than others assuming responsibility. As has already been highlighted, a mistake has been made but it doesn't necessarily indicate a review of training. Issues such as this may suppress individuals, which in turn could cause even more mistakes to happen because people could fear posting on this site.
>
> Sean Riley
>
> On 1 Jul 2013, at 11:15, "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:21:39 +0000
> From: Kirsty Miller <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451) [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:44:02 +0000
> From: "LONG S. (444451)" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree Kirsty.
>
> What ever happened to sense of community, looking out for one another and helping fellow comrades? I am not going to get into a philosophical debate but some people need to reconsider their definition of ethics.
>
> I have recently passed my PhD with very minor corrections, and I am now a professional. I do not consider some of the things I have read on this list either professional, helpful or integral.
>
> I will be unsubscribing.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kirsty Miller [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451) [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:51:42 +0000
> From: Deborah Husbands <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>
> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be circulated for information?
>
> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone else's error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to as researchers.
>
> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as result of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited from the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>
> _____________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kirsty Miller [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451) [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:55:40 +0100
> From: "Linda K. Berkeley" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Could we please all just simmer down here?
>
> Why would people leave a useful list because some people got upset about the
> student's mistake? If there's a "brain drain", then we don't have a list,
> and we don't have access to each other; albeit more supportive terms would
> be preferable.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah Husbands
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:52
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this
> list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is
> supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>
> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be circulated
> for information?
>
> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone else's
> error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to as
> researchers.
>
> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as result
> of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited from
> the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>
> _____________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kirsty Miller
> [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to
> be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to
> other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451)
> [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately
> responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate
> to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with.
> Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student
> by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this
> for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors
> emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On
> Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the
> very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell"
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To:
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
> with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
> 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
> guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309
> Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:29:36 +0100
> From: Ruth Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this
> list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the
> emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of
> the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake
> but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how
> wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures
> from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate
> either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and
> these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has
> previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the
> individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in
> 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested
> I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm
> emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's
> simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at
> least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this
> afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has
> been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's
> obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the
> message.
>
> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group.
> As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 13:29, Ruth Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this
>> list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the
>> emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of
>> the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake
>> but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how
>> wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures
>> from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate
>> either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and
>> these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has
>> previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the
>> individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in
>> 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested
>> I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm
>> emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's
>> simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at
>> least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this
>> afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has
>> been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's
>> obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the
>> message.
>>
>> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group.
>> As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>>
>>
>> On 1 July 2013 12:55, Linda K. Berkeley <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>> Could we please all just simmer down here?
>>>
>>> Why would people leave a useful list because some people got upset about
>>> the
>>> student's mistake? If there's a "brain drain", then we don't have a list,
>>> and we don't have access to each other; albeit more supportive terms would
>>> be preferable.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah Husbands
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:52
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this
>>> list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is
>>> supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>>>
>>> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be
>>> circulated
>>> for information?
>>>
>>> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone
>>> else's
>>> error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to
>>> as
>>> researchers.
>>>
>>> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as
>>> result
>>> of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited
>>> from
>>> the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>>>
>>> _____________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kirsty Miller
>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want
>>> to
>>> be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to
>>> other people's supervisors.
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451)
>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell
>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately
>>> responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly
>>> appropriate
>>> to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>> Cc: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with.
>>> Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student
>>> by contacting their supervisor?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell
>>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>>> this
>>> for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>>> supervisors
>>> emails so I will be contacting them.
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Hammond, Kate
>>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>>> Kate
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>> On
>>> Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
>>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>>> the
>>> very least.
>>>
>>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>>
>>> Aine
>>>
>>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell"
>>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul
>>> 2013
>>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>>
>>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>>> To:
>>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>>> completion test.
>>>>
>>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>>> to take part.
>>>>
>>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>>
>>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>>
>>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Aine Ito
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
>>> with registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>>> 038302).
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>>>
>>> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
>>> guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309
>>> Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:35:28 +0000
> From: "Cox, Hamish" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Mailing list use
>
> Hi all,
>
> The recent discussions related to ethical approval for questionnaires, and using the mailing list in general for research participants, will be taken to the next PsyPAG committee meeting.
>
> There have been a few disagreements recently around this subject and although PsyPAG does not technically own the list, we do monitor and 'police' it. As a result, using the list for research participants in general will be taken to the committee for further discussion. If the committee decide that using the list for such purposes is causing more hassle than it is worth then we will explore possible solutions -
> - Introducing a new list solely for this purpose
> - Introducing formal posting guidelines
> - Closing the mailing list
>
> Can I ask that we remain supportive to all in our efforts to expand research knowledge and continue to develop a friendly online community of psychologists.
>
> I will update in the coming weeks when we have had a chance to discuss the matter.
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> Hamish Cox PGDip, MSc
> PsyPAG<http://www.psypag.co.uk> Communications Officer and DSEP Representative
> AASP<http://www.appliedsportpsych.org> Student International Representative
>
> PhD Researcher, Sport Psychology
> School of Sport
> Cyncoed Campus
> Cardiff Metropolitan University
>
> E: [log in to unmask]
> M: 07921332903
> LinkedIn profile<http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/hamish-cox/38/936/9b0>
>
>
> ________________________________
> PsyPAG 28th Annual Conference | 17-19 July 2013 | Lancaster University |psypag2013.lancs.ac.uk<http://psypag2013.lancs.ac.uk> | twitter.com/PsyPag2013<http://twitter.com/PsyPag2013>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:39:52 +0000
> From: "Meredith, Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to take this opportunity to raise the issue of what people actually want from this group, because at the moment I see it as having only two functions - the first being to advertise research, and the second as a statistic support group (mainly through the very kind efforts of one or two of our members). However, the reality is that we could be doing a lot more to support each other. The optimal means of doing this would be a forum, where we could have sections dedicated to various elements - i.e. does this proposal make sense, can you check the ethics of this study, will you take part in my research, etc. A forum does take more effort and will require volunteers to police it, etc. but it, and the group, would be much more supportive as a product of that change.
>
> Alex Meredith,
> Nottingham Trent University.
>
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth Johnson
> Sent: 01 July 2013 13:30
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>
> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
> [https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif]
>
> On 1 July 2013 13:29, Ruth Johnson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>
> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>
> On 1 July 2013 12:55, Linda K. Berkeley <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Could we please all just simmer down here?
>
> Why would people leave a useful list because some people got upset about the
> student's mistake? If there's a "brain drain", then we don't have a list,
> and we don't have access to each other; albeit more supportive terms would
> be preferable.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Deborah Husbands
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:52
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this
> list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is
> supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>
> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be circulated
> for information?
>
> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone else's
> error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to as
> researchers.
>
> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as result
> of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited from
> the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>
> _____________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of Kirsty Miller
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to
> be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to
> other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of LONG S. (444451)
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately
> responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate
> to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with.
> Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student
> by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this
> for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors
> emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>] On
> Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the
> very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell"
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To:
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
> with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
> 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
> guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309
> Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:44:39 +0000
> From: "STOCKER R." <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Good call Alex. I think quite a few UK based postgrad students use http://www.postgraduateforum.com/ - there's quite a few psych/social science students on there however not much about statistical advice, and no section to advertise research either.
>
> A forum would seem to be a better idea IMHO.
>
> Rachel
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Meredith, Alexander
> Sent: 01 July 2013 13:40
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to take this opportunity to raise the issue of what people actually want from this group, because at the moment I see it as having only two functions - the first being to advertise research, and the second as a statistic support group (mainly through the very kind efforts of one or two of our members). However, the reality is that we could be doing a lot more to support each other. The optimal means of doing this would be a forum, where we could have sections dedicated to various elements - i.e. does this proposal make sense, can you check the ethics of this study, will you take part in my research, etc. A forum does take more effort and will require volunteers to police it, etc. but it, and the group, would be much more supportive as a product of that change.
>
> Alex Meredith,
> Nottingham Trent University.
>
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth Johnson
> Sent: 01 July 2013 13:30
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>
> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
> [https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif]
>
> On 1 July 2013 13:29, Ruth Johnson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>
> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>
> On 1 July 2013 12:55, Linda K. Berkeley <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Could we please all just simmer down here?
>
> Why would people leave a useful list because some people got upset about the
> student's mistake? If there's a "brain drain", then we don't have a list,
> and we don't have access to each other; albeit more supportive terms would
> be preferable.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Deborah Husbands
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:52
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this
> list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is
> supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>
> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be circulated
> for information?
>
> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone else's
> error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to as
> researchers.
>
> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as result
> of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited from
> the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>
> _____________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of Kirsty Miller
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to
> be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to
> other people's supervisors.
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of LONG S. (444451)
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately
> responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate
> to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with.
> Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student
> by contacting their supervisor?
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> wrote:
> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this
> for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors
> emails so I will be contacting them.
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Hammond, Kate
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>] On
> Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the
> very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell"
> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To:
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
> with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
> 038302).
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
> guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309
> Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:45:08 +0100
> From: Clare Sutherland <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hello,
>
> I completely agree with Alex - and also I've previously advocated for splitting the list into sections (e.g. one for statistical solutions, one for participant adverts, possibly with a commitment to actually doing experiments posted onto the list). As someone else commented, it might be useful to have an explicit set of rules/guidelines which explain things like multiple posting, ethical guidelines and whatever - since people join and leave all the time, it would be useful to have some continuity.
>
> Either way, I don't think that having "a list" is the way forward and I'm glad that the committee seem to be finally examining this.
>
> Interested to hear people's thoughts.
>
> Clare
>
>
>
> On 1 Jul 2013, at 13:39, Meredith, Alexander wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’d like to take this opportunity to raise the issue of what people actually want from this group, because at the moment I see it as having only two functions – the first being to advertise research, and the second as a statistic support group (mainly through the very kind efforts of one or two of our members). However, the reality is that we could be doing a lot more to support each other. The optimal means of doing this would be a forum, where we could have sections dedicated to various elements – i.e. does this proposal make sense, can you check the ethics of this study, will you take part in my research, etc. A forum does take more effort and will require volunteers to police it, etc. but it, and the group, would be much more supportive as a product of that change.
>>
>> Alex Meredith,
>> Nottingham Trent University.
>>
>>
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth Johnson
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 13:30
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>>
>> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>>
>>
>> On 1 July 2013 13:29, Ruth Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> I think this whole thread is appalling, I will be unsubscribing to this list which is a real shame. I thought that some of the content in the emails was great, but when things like this occur it's appalling. Some of the people in here have not only made it clear that Aine has made a mistake but if I were her and were having many MANY people continuously tell me how wrong I was I would feel embarrassed and very stressed. As for the lectures from people about multiple postings, I don't think that is appropriate either, there are people always joining email groups such as this, and these people will not have had a chance to complete another study that has previously been posted. I agree that there are extremes (such as the individual 6 weeks+ ago) but generally, so what if they post it 3 times in 3 weeks? Who cares? I don't - if I've done the study, or I'm not interested I will simply delete the email. What i find more irritating is "i'm emailing their supervisor" "it's awful" "you should know better" "it's simply not acceptable" there were 10+ this morning, and now there are at least another 18 about it (granted I agree with the majority this afternoon, telling people to stop emailing about it and that now Aine has been informed she needs to contact her supervisor herself), and she's obviously going to be feeling awful now. Leave it alone! She has got the message.
>>
>> Now just to figure out how to leave this NEGATIVE and UNSUPPORTIVE group. As psychologists we should really know better than this!
>>
>> On 1 July 2013 12:55, Linda K. Berkeley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Could we please all just simmer down here?
>>
>> Why would people leave a useful list because some people got upset about the
>> student's mistake? If there's a "brain drain", then we don't have a list,
>> and we don't have access to each other; albeit more supportive terms would
>> be preferable.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deborah Husbands
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:52
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I certainly agree that, at times, the tone that has been adopted on this
>> list in cases of error has been rather punitive considering that this is
>> supposed to be a supportive, learning community of PhD researchers.
>>
>> Is there a code of conduct that anyone is aware of that could be circulated
>> for information?
>>
>> There is learning to be had from every situation - even from someone else's
>> error which serves as a timely reminder of the ethics we are committed to as
>> researchers.
>>
>> It would be a real pity for this list to experience 'brain drain' as result
>> of the actions/expressions of some especially as I, too, have benefited from
>> the collective wisdom of researchers on this list.
>>
>> _____________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Kirsty Miller
>> [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 12:21 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Can someone tell us how to leave this list please? I certainly don't want to
>> be part of a community where people feel it appropriate to tell tales to
>> other people's supervisors.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of LONG S. (444451)
>> [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:45
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Remove me from the mailing list, please!
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Nancy.Rowell
>> [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:34
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Supervisors are supposed to be training their students and are ultimately
>> responsible for what they do, therefore I would see it as wholly appropriate
>> to contact them and alert them to training needs.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Jodie Butler [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 11:26
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Cc: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt with.
>> Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the student
>> by contacting their supervisor?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all this
>> for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her supervisors
>> emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate
>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists.
>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On
>> Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell
>> [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the
>> very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell"
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To:
>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
>> with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>>
>> The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by
>> guarantee. Registration number: 977818 England. Registered Office: 309
>> Regent Street, London W1B 2UW.
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> Clare Sutherland
>
> PhD student
> Room A003
> Department of Psychology
> The University of York
> Heslington
> York YO10 5DD
>
> Tel: +44 1904 322861
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:48:27 +0000
> From: Josephine Booth <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Psychology demonstrator
>
> The School of Psychology at the University of Dundee is currently advertising for a Psychology Demonstrator - 2 year position.
>
> http://www.jobs.dundee.ac.uk/fe/tpl_uod01.asp?s=4A515F4E5A565B1A&jobid=81933,1258237158&key=76261520&c=629598467778&pagestamp=dbzeudjgiomzxqywxw
>
> Closing date - 7th July.
>
>
> Dr Josie Booth CPsychol
>
> Lecturer
>
> School of Psychology
>
> The University of Dundee
>
> Dundee
>
> DD1 4HN
>
> UK
>
>
>
> Telephone: + 44 (0)1382 384187
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:55:57 +0100
> From: Ben Haysom-Newport <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Students at the University of Reading
>
> Hi Guys
>
> I am working with the BPS Wessex Branch, and am trying to rekindle some
> spark into the Thames Valley Hub. The only university in the area is
> Reading, and I am trying to recruit volunteer/s to help me. You wouldn't be
> agreeing to do much, just offer opinions from time to time, and perhaps
> assist in pragmatic matters.
>
> If you are at Reading and are willing to help, please get back to me.
>
>
> Best Wishes
> Ben Haysom-Newport MSc, BSc (Hons), MBPsS
> BPS Wessex Branch Committee Member
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:15:05 +0100
> From: Kirsten Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Rachel in response to your serious question the guidelines in regards to
> practicing psychologists from both the BPS and the legal regulatory body (the
> HPCP, Health and Care Professions Council) are clear, if a psychologist was
> found to be engaging in unethical practices it is the ethical duty of
> colleagues to not just report them to their supervisors but to the HPCP,
> which could result in legal sanctions against that psychologist (including
> being struck off). For a student it would be no different, peers would be
> expected to report examples of unethical practice conducted by other
> students.
>
> However, there are few if any guidelines for academics and researchers.
> Fundamentally the issue is one of harm, unethical practices that put either
> a client or a participant at risk of harm should be identified. However,
> there are no standards for ethical teaching for postgraduates studying on
> research doctorates and therefore the level of understanding of ethical
> issues undoubtedly varies considerably depending on the institution and the
> culture. Consequently students will make mistakes that maybe the result of
> a lack of training in identifying ethical issues rather than any deliberate
> attempt to deceive /cut corners/take liberties.
>
> To be honest it is not uncommon to find that people do not think surveys
> require ethical approval, because they believe that filling in a survey is
> unlikely to do much harm.
>
> I am currently a member of a BPS working party linked to the BPS ethics
> committee who are attempting to address this issue. Our aim is to produce
> some materials to aid in the teaching of ethics and guidelines for
> educators and students in ethical competencies.
>
> Kirsten.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:10 PM, STOCKER R. <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> It’s a difficult one. It’s clear that Aine has either had poor
>> supervision OR has ignored/misunderstood her supervision guidance and
>> ethics committee. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> However at the same time I would doubt that a doctoral psychology student
>> could have come this far yet be in complete ignorance of the BPS ethical
>> guidelines and imperatives for conducting research.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It probably hasn’t done much harm per se. It was mentioned during
>> multiple-survey-invitations-gate (!) a few months back that we have
>> responsibilities, as researchers, to follow ethical guidelines and conduct
>> ourselves appropriately during research. Is there anything in the BPS
>> guidelines about whistleblowing? (Genuine question!)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Rachel****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:
>> [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Meredith, Alexander
>> *Sent:* 01 July 2013 11:44
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi, ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> For reference sake, I agree with Jodie – I also don’t think any of us have
>> the authority to contact people’s supervisors – we are not a regulatory
>> body and contacting them would be stepping outside of our remit (not that
>> we have one per se). We have expressed, in strong terms, our concerns with
>> the study as is and pointed Aine in the direction of BPS regulations, that
>> is all we can (and should) do.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Alex Meredith, ****
>>
>> Nottingham Trent University****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *From:* Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> mailto:[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Jodie Butler
>> *Sent:* 01 July 2013 11:27
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt
>> with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the
>> student by contacting their supervisor? ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57****
>>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>> Kate
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>> [log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>> Security System.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may
>> contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended
>> addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In
>> this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and
>> information in this email that do not relate to the official business of
>> Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor
>> endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to
>> ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise
>> that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are
>> actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice. ****
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirsten Bartlett
> Research assistant in Psycholinguistics
> Psychology dept. University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD UK
>
> email; [log in to unmask]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:05:13 +0100
> From: Jodie Butler <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> For the record, I took part in an NHS study with NHS ethical approval
> (granted this was an internal study, internally funded and run) where it
> was taken for granted that by filling out the questionnaire, participants
> had given their consent to take part.
>
> As an aside, I think the actions of Nancy, who has been pretty quiet since
> informing everybody she is going to email Aine's supervisors whilst acting
> in the role of some kind of self-appointed list policewomen, are terrible
> and I'm seriously considering leaving the list too. It just seems to have
> soured the whole thing for me and goes against the spirit of the list as a
> supportive enviroment.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>> the very least.
>>
>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>
>> Nancy
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>
>> Aine
>>
>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>
>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>> completion test.
>>>
>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>> to take part.
>>>
>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>
>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>
>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> Aine Ito
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>
>>
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>> 038302).
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:26:25 +0000
> From: "Meredith, Alexander" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Hi all,
>
> This has obviously been a pretty weird day but I would encourage those thinking of leaving to hang fire until we hear back from the PSYPAG meeting which was mentioned. I'd like to see what happens there, and what their thoughts are for the future (re. a forum maybe, as I mentioned earlier). On top of that, please remember that the majority of people who have written today have said 'yes, errors were made and need to be corrected', but only one person has taken that too far (in my opinion). So, on that basis, I would urge people to give it a day or two and then see how they feel.
>
> Alex Meredith
> Nottingham Trent University
>
> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jodie Butler
> Sent: 01 July 2013 18:05
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> For the record, I took part in an NHS study with NHS ethical approval (granted this was an internal study, internally funded and run) where it was taken for granted that by filling out the questionnaire, participants had given their consent to take part.
>
> As an aside, I think the actions of Nancy, who has been pretty quiet since informing everybody she is going to email Aine's supervisors whilst acting in the role of some kind of self-appointed list policewomen, are terrible and I'm seriously considering leaving the list too. It just seems to have soured the whole thing for me and goes against the spirit of the list as a supportive enviroment.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at the very least.
>
> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>
> Nancy
> ________________________________________
> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
> To: Nancy.Rowell
> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>
> Aine
>
> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
> 09:53:10 +0100:
>
>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>> completion test.
>>
>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>> to take part.
>>
>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>
>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>
>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> Aine Ito
>>
>>
>> --
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:27:02 +0200
> From: Alessandra Stella <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
> Da: "Alessandra Stella" <[log in to unmask]>
> Data: 01/lug/2013 19:25
> Oggetto: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
> A: "Jodie Butler" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> I agree with Jodie about Nancy's behaviour. Moreover I think there so "much
> ado about nothing". You told her. She understood. Period. Now stop spamming
> my inbox.
> Il giorno 01/lug/2013 19:15, "Jodie Butler" <[log in to unmask]> ha
> scritto:
>
> For the record, I took part in an NHS study with NHS ethical approval
>> (granted this was an internal study, internally funded and run) where it
>> was taken for granted that by filling out the questionnaire, participants
>> had given their consent to take part.
>>
>> As an aside, I think the actions of Nancy, who has been pretty quiet since
>> informing everybody she is going to email Aine's supervisors whilst acting
>> in the role of some kind of self-appointed list policewomen, are terrible
>> and I'm seriously considering leaving the list too. It just seems to have
>> soured the whole thing for me and goes against the spirit of the list as a
>> supportive enviroment.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>>> the very least.
>>>
>>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>>
>>> Aine
>>>
>>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>>
>>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>>> completion test.
>>>>
>>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>>> to take part.
>>>>
>>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>>
>>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>>
>>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Aine Ito
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>>> 038302).
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:38:00 +0200
> From: Alessandra Stella <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> I agree with Jodie about Nancy's behaviour. Moreover I really think there
> is "much ado about nothing". You told her. She understood. Now stop
> spamming my inbox.
> Il giorno 01/lug/2013 13:10, "Jodie Butler" <[log in to unmask]> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Thanks, I'm glad somebody else agrees. The student has messed up, they've
>> been made aware of it. Absolutely no need to contact the supervisor and "alert
>> them to training needs."
>>
>> At the very least, this should be a group for PhD/Grad students to support
>> and help each other, not cause trouble for somebody when they've made a
>> mistake. Contacting the supervisor goes against the spirit of this message
>> board.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Meredith, Alexander <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For reference sake, I agree with Jodie – I also don’t think any of us
>>> have the authority to contact people’s supervisors – we are not a
>>> regulatory body and contacting them would be stepping outside of our remit
>>> (not that we have one per se). We have expressed, in strong terms, our
>>> concerns with the study as is and pointed Aine in the direction of BPS
>>> regulations, that is all we can (and should) do.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex Meredith,
>>>
>>> Nottingham Trent University
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Research of postgraduate psychologists. [mailto:
>>> [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Jodie Butler
>>> *Sent:* 01 July 2013 11:27
>>>
>>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>>> *Subject:* Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If this is an innocent mistake, which now looks like it's been dealt
>>> with. Is there really any need to cause further trouble/distress for the
>>> student by contacting their supervisor?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Aine has now communicated to me that she didn't realise she needed all
>>> this for what is apparently some sort of pilot. She has provided her
>>> supervisors emails so I will be contacting them.
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Hammond, Kate [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:57
>>>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> I agree. If you want examples, then you can get excellent ones from the
>>> surveys posted on here so it's really not a big job to do. I also think
>>> it's a data protection issue - that you need to tell people how their data
>>> will be stored, keep/destroyed.
>>> Kate
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Research of postgraduate psychologists. [
>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy.Rowell [
>>> [log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:44
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>>> the very least.
>>>
>>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>>
>>> Nancy
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>
>>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>>
>>> Aine
>>>
>>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>>
>>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>>> completion test.
>>>>
>>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>>> to take part.
>>>>
>>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>>
>>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>>
>>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Aine Ito
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>>> 038302).
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>>> Security System.
>>>
>>>
>>> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may
>>> contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended
>>> addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In
>>> this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and
>>> information in this email that do not relate to the official business of
>>> Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor
>>> endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to
>>> ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise
>>> that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are
>>> actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:34:27 +0100
> From: Kevin Prinsloo <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>
> Dear administrator,
>
> I Would it be possible to be removed from this mailing list. I know there
> has been previous emails on how to do this but please re post, I really can
> no longer be apart of this mailing list!!
>
> Best
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 18:27, Alessandra Stella <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ----------
>> Da: "Alessandra Stella" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Data: 01/lug/2013 19:25
>> Oggetto: Re: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>> A: "Jodie Butler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> I agree with Jodie about Nancy's behaviour. Moreover I think there so
>> "much ado about nothing". You told her. She understood. Period. Now stop
>> spamming my inbox.
>> Il giorno 01/lug/2013 19:15, "Jodie Butler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> For the record, I took part in an NHS study with NHS ethical approval
>>> (granted this was an internal study, internally funded and run) where it
>>> was taken for granted that by filling out the questionnaire, participants
>>> had given their consent to take part.
>>>
>>> As an aside, I think the actions of Nancy, who has been pretty quiet
>>> since informing everybody she is going to email Aine's supervisors whilst
>>> acting in the role of some kind of self-appointed list policewomen, are
>>> terrible and I'm seriously considering leaving the list too. It just seems
>>> to have soured the whole thing for me and goes against the spirit of the
>>> list as a supportive enviroment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Nancy.Rowell <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sending this to the list as well, because this is a discussion point at
>>>> the very least.
>>>>
>>>> That simply is not acceptable - you must have a brief and ensure your
>>>> participants know their ethical rights (right to withdraw, confidentiality
>>>> etc). You must tell participants that you have ethical approval.
>>>> Who is your supervisor(s)? Please send me their email address
>>>>
>>>> Nancy
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 10:01
>>>> To: Nancy.Rowell
>>>> Subject: RE: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>
>>>> There is none, I regard completing the survey as agreeing to participate.
>>>>
>>>> Aine
>>>>
>>>> Quoting "Nancy.Rowell" <[log in to unmask]> on Mon, 1 Jul 2013
>>>> 09:53:10 +0100:
>>>>
>>>>> Where is the consent form, ethics approval etc for this survey?
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Aine Ito [[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> Sent: 01 July 2013 08:46
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: 10 min. test for a chance to win £10 voucher
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for participants to take part in my online sentence
>>>>> completion test.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must be a *NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER*, and must not be colour-blind
>>>>> to take part.
>>>>>
>>>>> It should take 5-10 minutes to complete, and you'll be entered into a
>>>>> draw to win a £10 Amazon gift voucher on the completion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please click the link below to participate.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=co6a8w0cmca0e1c291271
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aine Ito
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391),
>>>>> an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in
>>>>> Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>>>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an
>>>> exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC
>>>> 038302).
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of PSYCH-POSTGRADS Digest - 30 Jun 2013 to 1 Jul 2013 - Special issue (#2013-147)
> *************************************************************************************
|
