On 7/5/13 11:44 AM, "Vincent Giersch" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>But I don't really know why it was not working wrapped in a Response
>element (I looked for differences between my assertion and the example
>provided in the live DVD to find a clue).
It's been too long, but my recollection is that the SAML object mech_eap
is passing into the library is assumed to be a SAML assertion. If support
for responses were required, that code would need to step down into the
message to pass in the assertion. The library doesn't process protocol
messages when it's being asked to process assertions.
In this context, there's no SAML protocol, so using a Response would be an
odd thing to do.
-- Scott
|