Hi Steve/All,
This is on today's ops agenda. However a quick response…. From the EGI announcement/text (https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/ROD_MW_alarm_template#Decommissioning_of_non_SHA-2_compliant_services) and particularly "we highly recommend that services that are not SHA-2 compliant are upgraded to a version of the software which supports SHA-2 by: 01-10-2013", I think it is sufficient that you explain in your ticket that those CEs are shortly to be decommissioned anyway. The migration is currently recommended and not mandatory. The monitoring campaign is aimed at raising awareness (it seems to be working though with some confusion in places!).
Jeremy
On 23 Jul 2013, at 09:58, Stephen Jones wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 04:25 PM, Matt Doidge wrote:
>> SHA-2 hitting the fan...
>> As mentioned by Kashif, a number of sites have been handed out tickets after failing SHA-2 tests. Liverpool, Lancaster, RALPP, Bristol, ECDF and Durham have all received tickets for one or two of their CREAM CEs, IC received one for their WMS (which Daniela has already expressed her righteous displeasure about). Most are In Progress already.
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This seems wasteful. We are in the midst of migration from the CEs that have been ticketed (SL5/EMI2) to a new set-up using SL6/EMI3. So why do we test and ticket the obsolete systems? They are only used for parallel running until the experiments migrate to EMI3/SL6, then they will be wound down. I guess I'd do it, but I have an honest question - is there a way to head off this by using some foresight in the central planning? Oh, to heck with it - maybe I'll just fling the new version on and see if it survives!
>
> Steve
>
> --
> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> System Administrator office: 220
> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794 2334
> University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
|