Thanks for the reply Christian
it is good to know
however, ignoring current ICs explaining 1000%
of variance - whatever that means
still some of the TICA maps with strong task-correlation
that am getting know with FSL 504 still look much different
from the correlated maps I used to get using prior releases i.e. FSL 501 502
(vs 504) ... let alone that using the same images and automatic
dimension selection now gives 39 ICs when before it was consistently
giving 75...and I swear I am using exactly the same GUI setup
and same input scans..
but sure, is possible that am missing something
and that still have much to learn
guess that for now I have to assume that the maps am getting now
represent a fair output
cheers
ds
|