> Jess asked that none of the WVM adjustments went into the release. So do
I was initially confused by Jess's messages in what I had thought were
conflicting.
> included the updated WVM functions. To be consistent we should not be
> shipping with the experimental WVM adjustments either: 48a783, 4c8e9d18,
> 4f12e742 and 515eed7 from early February.
But those are already in the branch. Since it's not local, wouldn't it
mess up the branch history if I attempt to remove these three from
hikianalia?
> d0c291b seems fine but will need the follow on fix from David: b5dea7f and
> 64df832. I'm not bothered much if you don't include them though.
I've included these.
Malcolm
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|