JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  April 2013

CCP4BB April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Alternate sugar conformations in refmac 5.5.0110

From:

Dom Bellini <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:27:57 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (178 lines)

Dear Markus,

You could also try the "inse" keyword, which will tell refmac two mutually exclude two atoms occupying the same position but we occupancy for example of 0.6 and 0.4, stopping them from repelling each other.

Here is an example in the case of an Fe site which was contaminated by Mn in some of the molecules in the crystal:

"external distance first residue 401 inse A chain A atom MN second residue 401 chain A atom FE value 0.0 sigma 0.01 type 1"

I guess you could use it on your sugar atoms ...

Best,

D

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: 19 April 2013 08:47
To: ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Alternate sugar conformations in refmac 5.5.0110

Dear Markus,

I just did a test: I generated in Coot an alternative conformation for an ASN with attached NAG, wrote out the coordinates and manually adapted the LINK record, read it back in in Coot and hit the Refmac button (version 5.7.0029). Except for some green difference density because I fitted an alternate conformation where there was none, everything went fine, there was no repulsion. I used the following link records in PDB standard (I believe it is long overdue that Refmac gives up his own idiosyncratic syntax, but that is another story).
LINK ND2AASN B 199 C1 ANAG B 501
LINK ND2BASN B 199 C1 BNAG B 501
No link type is specified, but Coot/Refmac figure out themselves the correct link.

I think Thomas Lueteke made a valid point. If you fit the alternative conformation in a strained conformation, it will move away, maybe even out of density, to relieve this strain. Coot/Refmac handle sugars very well and just doing a real space refinement usually solves the problem in less than a second. Just specify one of the altnernative NAG molecules. Do not include the ASN and the other NAG. If that does not work, you could try to first refine the B-conformer alone, and then combine the two conformers.

Best regards,
Herman
 

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Markus Meier
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Alternate sugar conformations in refmac 5.5.0110

Hi Robbie,

Oops, sorry, I used
CCP4 6.3: Refmac_5.7.0032 version 5.7.0032 : 05/09/12
(confirmed by the log file)

so I am using the current version and the problem still persists.

Thanks!
Markus


On 18/04/13 03:31 PM, Robbie Joosten wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> You could try changing your Refmac version. The version you are using
> is ancient. You may have an old version in your PATH next to the new one because your CCP4 seems up to date.
>
> AFAICT there is nothing wrong with the LINKR or the HETATM records
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: Markus Meier
> Sent: 2013-04-18 22:19
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Alternate sugar conformations in refmac 5.5.0110
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to refine a beta-D-N-Acetyl glucosamine moiety (NAG)
> linked to an asparagine (ASN) in Refmac.
> (version CCP4 6.3: Refmac_5.5.0110 version 5.5.0110 : 08/05/10)
>
> The sugar has two alternate conformations that occupy the same
> position in the electron density but are rotated 180° relative to each
> other. Even though I have defined two alternate conformations for the
> asparagine side chain, the sugar and the beta-link, Refmac pushes the
> two conformations apart, out of the electron density (while still
> honouring the link to Asn). So it seems that Refmac applies repulsive forces between the alternate conformations.
>
> Did anyone else experience this and/or can suggest a fix?
> All help is very much appreciated!
>
> My definitions for the alternate conformations in the PDB file are below:
>
> LINKR C1 ANAG E 1 ND2AASN A 116 NAG-ASN
> LINKR C1 BNAG E 1 ND2BASN A 116 NAG-ASN
> HETATM 125 C1 ANAG E 1 30.978 40.626 -25.446 0.50 98.96 E C
> HETATM 126 C2 ANAG E 1 30.428 41.897 -26.138 0.50100.81 E C
> HETATM 127 N2 ANAG E 1 29.783 41.751 -27.447 0.50 94.26 E N
> HETATM 128 C7 ANAG E 1 28.807 42.561 -27.924 0.50 89.45 E C
> HETATM 129 O7 ANAG E 1 28.325 42.377 -29.035 0.50 83.16 E O
> HETATM 130 C8 ANAG E 1 28.252 43.720 -27.128 0.50 87.63 E C
> HETATM 131 C3 ANAG E 1 31.618 42.847 -26.221 0.50102.77 E C
> HETATM 132 O3 ANAG E 1 31.420 43.888 -27.159 0.50102.25 E O
> HETATM 133 C4 ANAG E 1 31.840 43.369 -24.802 0.50103.37 E C
> HETATM 134 O4 ANAG E 1 32.969 44.217 -24.782 0.50104.91 E O
> HETATM 135 C5 ANAG E 1 32.040 42.223 -23.785 0.50 94.99 E C
> HETATM 136 C6 ANAG E 1 31.564 42.633 -22.381 0.50 86.60 E C
> HETATM 137 O6 ANAG E 1 32.632 42.591 -21.462 0.50 77.76 E O
> HETATM 138 O5 ANAG E 1 31.458 40.954 -24.130 0.50 99.19 E O
> HETATM 139 C1 BNAG E 1 30.271 40.925 -24.108 0.50 98.96 E C
> HETATM 140 C2 BNAG E 1 31.415 41.878 -23.684 0.50100.81 E C
> HETATM 141 N2 BNAG E 1 32.048 41.664 -22.378 0.50 94.26 E N
> HETATM 142 C7 BNAG E 1 33.331 41.981 -22.079 0.50 89.45 E C
> HETATM 143 O7 BNAG E 1 33.784 41.778 -20.959 0.50 83.16 E O
> HETATM 144 C8 BNAG E 1 34.276 42.586 -23.092 0.50 87.63 E C
> HETATM 145 C3 BNAG E 1 30.816 43.277 -23.775 0.50102.77 E C
> HETATM 146 O3 BNAG E 1 31.569 44.240 -23.061 0.50102.25 E O
> HETATM 147 C4 BNAG E 1 30.718 43.597 -25.266 0.50103.37 E C
> HETATM 148 O4 BNAG E 1 30.115 44.862 -25.440 0.50104.91 E O
> HETATM 149 C5 BNAG E 1 29.907 42.532 -26.038 0.50 94.99 E C
> HETATM 150 C6 BNAG E 1 30.373 42.426 -27.500 0.50 86.60 E C
> HETATM 151 O6 BNAG E 1 29.320 42.743 -28.381 0.50 77.76 E O
> HETATM 152 O5 BNAG E 1 29.866 41.216 -25.458 0.50 99.19 E O
> ATOM 745 N ASN A 116 27.207 36.475 -25.453 1.00 62.15 A N
> ATOM 746 CA AASN A 116 28.475 37.144 -25.135 0.50 61.77 A C
> ATOM 747 CB AASN A 116 28.182 38.336 -24.223 0.50 69.02 A C
> ATOM 748 CG AASN A 116 29.037 39.555 -24.495 0.50 79.45 A C
> ATOM 749 OD1AASN A 116 28.656 40.644 -24.047 0.50 83.18 A O
> ATOM 750 ND2AASN A 116 30.178 39.419 -25.218 0.50 87.72 A N
> ATOM 751 C ASN A 116 29.353 36.143 -24.389 1.00 53.28 A C
> ATOM 752 O ASN A 116 29.778 36.380 -23.266 1.00 48.83 A O
> ATOM 753 CA BASN A 116 28.575 37.144 -25.135 0.50 61.77 A C
> ATOM 754 CB BASN A 116 28.282 38.336 -24.223 0.50 69.02 A C
> ATOM 755 CG BASN A 116 29.487 39.201 -23.920 0.50 79.45 A C
> ATOM 756 OD1BASN A 116 30.611 38.710 -24.084 0.50 83.18 A O
> ATOM 757 ND2BASN A 116 29.299 40.471 -23.478 0.50 87.72 A N
>
> The Refmac log output shows that link description was recognized correctly for each conformation:
> WARNING : residue: NAG 1 chain:EE
> atom: "O1 " is absent in coord_file
> WARNING : link(spec):NAG-ASN is found dist = 1.466 ideal_dist= 1.439
> ch:EE res: 1 NAG at:C1 A->AA res: 116 ASN at:ND2 A
> WARNING : link(spec):NAG-ASN is found dist = 1.244 ideal_dist= 1.439
> ch:EE res: 1 NAG at:C1 B->AA res: 116 ASN at:ND2 B
>
>
> Best regards,
> Markus
>
> --
> Markus Meier, Ph.D.
> University of Manitoba
> Department of Chemistry
> 144 Dysart Road

--
Markus Meier, Ph.D.
University of Manitoba
Department of Chemistry
144 Dysart Road
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
Phone: +1 204 474 7172
Fax: +1 204 474 7608
E-mail: [log in to unmask]



--

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.

Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.

Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.

Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

 







Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager