Mary, come to us in Ozland
Sent from my iPhone
On 27/03/2013, at 17:44, Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Presumably an injunction applies to the situation, not only the LMC?
>
> Is this a super-injunction, if EHI has had to remove a comment that there
> was an injunction?
>
> Has anyone asked the local press what this is all about?
>
> And I am trying to envision the circumstances which might apply to any sort
> of injunction taken out by contractors implementing a 111 contract...
> Does the same company hold any other contracts?
>
> Mary Hawking
> Retiring from NHS on 31.3.13 because of the Health and Social Care Act 2012
> "thinking - independent thinking - is to humans as swimming is to cats: we
> can do it if we really have to." Mark Earles on Radio 4
> blog http://maryhawking.wordpress.com/ , bloglist
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4529244/MH%20blog%20list.doc And Fred!
> http://primaryhealthinfo.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/who-knows-what-and-why/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julian Bradley
> Sent: 27 March 2013 00:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Cambridgeshire LMC and 111
>
> For the avoidance of doubt I was not suggesting you withdraw Trefor,
> rather that the injunction be withdrawn and we learn the full
> facts. As I wrote "keep up the good work".
>
> Trust this clarifies any misunderstanding.
>
> J
>
> At 23:31 26/03/2013, you wrote:
>> This is the paragraph that was there for 4 days and then disappeared
>>
>> " Dr Holden said the chief officers of Cambridgeshire LMC attended the GPC
>> meeting yesterday and were asked for a report on NHS 111, but said they
>> could not speak about it because they were "under an injunction." They
> could
>> not say who put the injunction in place."
>>
>> I have had confirmation from several sources that this is true.
>>
>> I will not withdraw.
>>
>> Trefor
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julian Bradley
>> Sent: 26 March 2013 23:11
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Cambridgeshire LMC and 111
>>
>> At 22:55 26/03/2013, you wrote:
>>> Getting into the [public domain.
>>>
>>> There is some sort of super injunction but the details are sketchy.
>>>
>>> I will continue to ask awkward questions.
>>>
>>> Trefor
>>
>> Trefor,
>>
>> Thank you for drawing this to our attention.
>>
>> I've seen your post on an EHI thread, but there doesn't seem to be anything
>> in the article currently visible. Has something been removed?
>>
>> Clearly we don't want to support defamation in the sense of opinion not
>> based on normal good faith, the kind of defamation that might land someone
>> before the GMC, but equally it's very hard to see that super-injunctions
>> will usually have any proper role in the discussion of NHS services.
>>
>> 111 providers should be in the same situation as GPs - as a profession we
>> rather often face totally unreasonable criticism, but there are limits that
>> cannot be exceeded even there.
>>
>> The only way we'll resolve this is with facts.
>>
>> Do keep up the good work if you can - until they serve an injunction on
> you,
>> or withdraw the whole thing and provide the actual information.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Julian
|