Well done Tref!
You've brought some of us lurkers out of the closet. At last we may have got those foolish, frightened and frightening impersonal bosses on the back foot. Let's stop them "designing the personal out" of our NHS. Surely that's worth a risk or two?
Mike D'Souza (an 'Ole Kodger from Kingston)
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Mar 2013, at 23:11, Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> At 22:55 26/03/2013, you wrote:
>> Getting into the [public domain.
>>
>> There is some sort of super injunction but the details are sketchy.
>>
>> I will continue to ask awkward questions.
>>
>> Trefor
>
> Trefor,
>
> Thank you for drawing this to our attention.
>
> I've seen your post on an EHI thread, but there doesn't seem to be anything in the article currently visible. Has something been removed?
>
> Clearly we don't want to support defamation in the sense of opinion not based on normal good faith, the kind of defamation that might land someone before the GMC, but equally it's very hard to see that super-injunctions will usually have any proper role in the discussion of NHS services.
>
> 111 providers should be in the same situation as GPs - as a profession we rather often face totally unreasonable criticism, but there are limits that cannot be exceeded even there.
>
> The only way we'll resolve this is with facts.
>
> Do keep up the good work if you can - until they serve an injunction on you, or withdraw the whole thing and provide the actual information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Julian
|