On 26 March 2013 23:11, Julian Bradley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've seen your post on an EHI thread, but there doesn't seem to be anything
> in the article currently visible. Has something been removed?
The article has changed, AFAICS.
Superinjunctions should be very very exceptional, and if one were to
be involved - clearly I don't know of any such thing - it would
require some very unusual matter nehind it.
I suppose it is possible that there has been one in the past which was
not lifted becuase it turned out to be justified, again, how would one
know what had been censored to protect the, unusually, blameless.
--
Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/
|