Oh lovely a "super-sized CMS'. Is that with extra chips?
________________________________________
From: Open Educational Resources [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of David Kernohan [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Educause paper on OER
"Ten years later: why open educational resources have not noticeably
affected higher education and why we should care"
http://t.co/6Vb3M4lQbI
I don't want to have a go at this paper specifically(*), but this is an
egregious example of a tendency that suggests that OER would be a far
better idea if it was just under more control, better organised and more
structured. I hear this kind of argument a reasonable amount and I'd love
to have a response to it that doesn't make me sound like a smelly hippy.
With the understanding that the wider ukoer community most likely gets why
solutions like this are unviable, I offered a prize for the most
interesting response (as a blog post) via twitter - and I want to offer if
here too.
One large drink (of the author's choice) for the best (by my personal
judgement... cause, hey, I'm buying the drink) blogged response to the
paper from a UKOER community member.
Deadline would be the start of CETIS13 (12th March)
David
* I'll let you do that....
--
David Kernohan
UKOER Programme Manager
eLearning Innovation Team
JISC
e:[log in to unmask]
p:3rd Floor, Beacon House, Bristol BS8 1QU
s:david.kernohan
t: dkernohan, ukoer
m: 07917599296
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anything in this message which does not clearly relate to the official
work of the sender's organisation shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by that organisation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|