Hi John,
yes, thanks. It seems to be an internal problemwith our list.
cheers
alessandra
On 08/02/2013 11:45, John Hill wrote:
> Hi Alessandra,
> I received it via Cambridge CERT. They got it as the site security
> contact. Linda Cornwall sent it out at 10:47:11 if that helps you find
> it.
> Cheers,
> John
>
> On 08/02/2013 11:41, Alessandra Forti wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> where did you get the advisory from?
>>
>> I can't find it in my inbox and I probably should receive it too.
>>
>> cheers
>> alessandra
>>
>> On 08/02/2013 11:12, John Hill wrote:
>>> We've just received an advisory on this via our CERT. It is rated as
>>> "High", but it is apparently OK to wait until the 18th when 1.8.6
>>> appears in UMD.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On 07/02/2013 14:40, Jeremy Coles wrote:
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> At the WLCG operations meeting it has just been indicated that an
>>>> update to 1.8.6 is now mandatory due to a security fix. The baseline
>>>> twiki page has been updated to reflect this requirement
>>>> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGBaselineVersions.
>>>>
>>>> Please can someone comment on whether update to 1.8.6 is required or
>>>> can the patch be applied to earlier versions? We have in the UK quite
>>>> a few sites on 1.8.5, 1.8.4 and one on 1.8.3
>>>> (http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~dbauer/grid/state_of_the_nation.html).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>
>>
--
Facts aren't facts if they come from the wrong people. (Paul Krugman)
|