On 26 February 2013 22:39, Andy Gibb <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 2013-02-26 1:38 PM, Riaz, Basmah wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I didn't get any errors in making the 850mu map, so it must have
>> something to do with the 450mu input files. I had downloaded all of the data
>> including calibrations, not sure which 450mu files are missing.
>>
>> Basmah
>>
> Hi Basmah,
>
> I understand what you're saying, but I'd really like to know the answer to
> my question :-) Do you still get a segfault if you give ONLY your science
> data to makemap (ie replace "s4*" with "s4?20130131_00022*")?
>
> If it does, can you include the full output from makemap in your next
> report?
>
> Makemap can sort out all of the data you gave it, but it won't be able to
> make a map because there is a mixture of sources - your list contains
> observations of Uranus as well as your target, and makemap can only make a
> single output map. If you want to make maps from each source separately,
> then try the ORAC-DR pipeline which is described in SUN 264 (type showme
> sun264 on your computer to get the manual to display in your web browser).
> Contact me if you need further assistance with that.
>
> Out of curiosity, I tested the Kapuahi version of makemap at JAC and these
> data reduce with no error, so there is no fundamental issue with them.
Was that producing a map of each source separately? I tried running
makemap on all the files, but I didn't spot that they were for
different sources. That would certainly explain the "cant find map
bounds" error I saw. But I should change makemap to give a more
helpful error message in these cases.
David
----
Starlink User Support list
For list configuration, including subscribing to and unsubscribing from the list, see
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=STARLINK
|