Dear FSL experts,
I ran default BedpostX on HARDI images (vols 0-60 have b=1000, vol 61 is b=0 on Philips) on images that had eddy_correct run on them and without. The eddy_correct images seem to produce false directions as seen with the dyads files and as later seen with probtrackx (e.g. an amygdala seed doesn't project anywhere out of close vicinity and voxel coordinates at the corpus callosum seed don't project anywhere either). The non eddy_corrected images seem to work fine. Am I supposed to use eddy_correct images as my data.nii.gz files? The same occurs for a subject of good and bad image quality.
Thank you,
Brian
|