JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RUDYARD-KIPLING Archives


RUDYARD-KIPLING Archives

RUDYARD-KIPLING Archives


RUDYARD-KIPLING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RUDYARD-KIPLING Home

RUDYARD-KIPLING Home

RUDYARD-KIPLING  January 2013

RUDYARD-KIPLING January 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: War graves

From:

Christopher Newbould <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Christopher Newbould <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:13:58 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (165 lines)

The memorial in Salisbury Cathedral, and a fine one, that I think Tim refers
to, is that of the Hon Edward Wyndham Tennant(himself a war poet), a
Grenadier officer killed on the Somme in 1916 - but he is buried close to
where he fell in Guillemont Road War Cemetery.

Certainly some officers were buried privately before the policy was decided
- the most famous example is the Zillebeke Church Cemetery, south of Ypres
in Belgium - sometimes referred to as the Aristocrat's graveyard - mostly
officers of the Foot Guards or Household Cavalry who died in 1914 during the
1st Battle of Ypres - some of these early ones have private headstones.

Yours
Christopher 
Colonel CJ Newbould CBE
Battlefield tours & lectures
"Bringing the Past to Life"
www.spiritofremembrance.com





-----Original Message-----
From: To exchange information and views on the life and work of Rudyard
Kipling [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Connell, Tim
Sent: 06 January 2013 20:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: War graves

And there may be some for officers of good family in the odd cathedral. I
believe there is one for a subaltern in Salisbury Cathedral, who died early
in the War, so that may have gone up before a policy had been decided.

Tim
___________
Tim Connell
Professor Emeritus City University
___________
07754 48 46 52
________________________________________
From: Christopher Newbould [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 06 January 2013 17:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: War graves

It is certainly true that one of the earliest principles of the War Graves
Commission was that all of our dead would be treated the same, with no
private memorials being permitted. That principle was adhered to throughout
both World Wars. There are a few exceptions that can be found in war
cemeteries that are near former Base areas, where it is clear that old
habits died hard. At Etaples War Cemetery for example, although all ranks
have the same headstone, the officers have been buried together, separate
from the men and on slightly higher ground. I always find this rather sad
when I go there.

Yours
Christopher
Colonel CJ Newbould CBE
Battlefield tours & lectures
"Bringing the Past to Life"
www.spiritofremembrance.com




-----Original Message-----
From: To exchange information and views on the life and work of Rudyard
Kipling [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of IMAP AIM
Sent: 06 January 2013 11:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: War graves

Pinney has a useful note to a letter in Vol 5, p.18

>>
the plans of the War Graves Commission, since they had become generally
known at the end of 1918, had provoked a determined oppostion to 3 main
points: the provision of a headstone rather than a cross; uniformity of
treatment for all graves; and the refusal to allow repatriation of the
remains. The conflict came to a head in the parliamentary debate of 4 May
1920, when the policies of the Commission were affirmed.
>>

The letter itself, to Col. Lewin, shows Kipling standing behind the
Commission's policies. He notes particularly that equality of treatment
'confirms and admits equality of sorrow' -- which forms the principle that
he, no democrat, holds to, in this situation.

John Lee




On 6 Jan 2013, at 11:39, Richards, David wrote:

> I thought Kipling's contribution on this question was rather to stand 
> firm
with his IWG Commission colleagues behind the proposition that officers and
other ranks would have the same uniform, individual grave marker, instead of
allowing different headstones or markers by rank, and instead of shipping
officers' bodies home (as was done I believe early in the war, before the
scale of the slaughter was known and made that economically improbable even
for recoverable bodies) and leaving other ranks to lie abroad.
>
> See my bibliography for the discovery of Kipling's preface to the 
> Cook's
brochure for travel to the battlefields of Belgium and France, which were
really cemetery tourism for the widows, parents, siblings and orphans of the
dead.
>
> Dave Richards
>
> From: To exchange information and views on the life and work of 
> Rudyard
Kipling [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alastair Wilson
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 4:19 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: War graves
>
> I don't know the answer to Fred's specific question, but I would think
that it was pretty generally a 'given' that all were buried together.  So
far as I am aware, in earlier wars, all the dead were buried together,
usually in common graves (you can't go and visit the individual grave of a
five-greats-grandfather who died at Waterloo).  So when the IWG Commission
was formed, I suspect that it was already in the terms of reference that the
dead from one area would all be buried in a single cemetery - but I don't
know.
> It is quite instructive to look at how differently different parishes
recorded their dead.  Many, possibly the majority, just recorded their
names, in alphabetical order.  Others recorded their names in alphabetical
order, but recorded also their rank or rating, and sometimes their regiment
or ship.  And a few (the parish church which I attended when I was growing
up was one), recorded the officers first, followed by the men.
> Alastair Wilson
>
>
> On 06/01/2013 00:16, Fred Lerner wrote:
> A colleague asks, "Do you know if it was Kipling's idea to bury the 
> men
and officers together rather than in separate places, in contrast for
example to their separate hospitalizations in England?"
>
> I don't, but I expect that someone on this list will.
>
> Fred Lerner
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
signature database 7864 (20130105) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> This email message from the law firm of McCarter & English, LLP is for 
> the
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
message.
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager