Great - that should be an easy way to get round this, then.
Thanks,
Vicky
On 23/01/13 09:35, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Good question. The way I am reading the code, the averaging indeed
> does not care if the peak list is active or not. But if you set the
> figure of merit to 0 for all the peaks in that peak list then they
> should not be used in the shift average. Fortunately there is a
> Propagate Merit button at the bottom of the Peak Table tab so setting
> them all to 0 should not be too painful.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Vicky Higman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> does Analysis average its chemical shifts across all peak lists,
>> regardless of whether they are active or not? It seems to me that
>> this is the case. But it means that when I have peak lists that have
>> been saved into the project by ARIA, I am then adding peaks with
>> (potentially incorrect) assignments to my chemical shift list.
>> However, if I find a mistake, I don't want to have to change the
>> assignment of peaks in every peak list, but just those in my active
>> "master peak list".
>>
>> Is there an easy way in which I can stop a whole peak list from
>> contributing to the chemical shifts in my chemical shift list?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Vicky
>>
>> --
>> ************************************************
>> Dr. Victoria A. Higman-Davies
>>
>> School of Chemistry
>> University of Bristol
>> Cantock's Close
>> Bristol BS8 1TS
>> U.K.
>>
>> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>> (or [log in to unmask])
>>
>> http://www.protein-nmr.org.uk
>> ************************************************
>>
--
************************************************
Dr. Victoria A. Higman-Davies
School of Chemistry
University of Bristol
Cantock's Close
Bristol BS8 1TS
U.K.
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
(or [log in to unmask])
http://www.protein-nmr.org.uk
************************************************
|