JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  January 2013

ACAD-AE-MED January 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 24 Jan 2013 to 25 Jan 2013 (#2013-4)

From:

"Bethel, Jim" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency Academic List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:05:58 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (403 lines)

As far as your question about delirium screening goes the 2007 urgent care working group recommended the Abbreviated Mental test (AMT4) which as the name suggests has only four criteria inherent in it and can be used for delirium screening as a new or existing co-morbid for instance in patients with # NOF 


http://www.akaz.ba/Klinicki_put/Dokumenti/DH_080136.pdf 

you might want to take a look at page 29 of 'the silver book' which also has links to best practice in this area of assessment


http://www.bgs.org.uk/campaigns/silverb/silver_book_complete.pdf


Jim Bethel

________________________________________
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of ACAD-AE-MED automatic digest system [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 26 January 2013 00:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 24 Jan 2013 to 25 Jan 2013 (#2013-4)

There are 4 messages totaling 1511 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. <No subject given> (4)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:42:21 +0000
From:    Coats Tim - Professor of Emergency Medicine <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: <No subject given>



There is a current trial on the NHS Research Portfolio under the 'Injuries and Emergencies' section http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/Portfolio.aspx?Level1=20&Level2=112&Level3=122&Status=34

16152419

FIB trial<http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7820> - Randomised trial of the fascia-iliaca block versus the 'three-in-one' block for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department

Open

Interventional

No


Trial outline is at http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7820

I think that I remember that it is CEM funded,

Tim

Prof T Coats
Professor of Emergency Medicine,
University of Leicester, UK.
________________________________
From: Accident and Emergency Academic List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Cronin
Sent: 23 January 2013 22:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:

Interesting what you say William about the lack of studies in the ED setting. I was part of a recent systematic review looking for acute pain studies in a different patient cohort & condition. The search strategy was broad and found hundreds (almost thousands) of studies/RCTs in the post-op and chronic pain settings. However, RCTs for pain in the emergency setting you could count on one hand! Obviously there are challenges for doing these studies in the ED/pre-hospital but it would be great to see more being performed going forward.

With regard to the NOF pain protocol, I think they may have one at the MidWestern Regional, Limerick so you could ask someone there

Good luck
John
On 23 January 2013 21:20, Ash Basu <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Some of us in our ED, perform US guided 3-in-1 blocks, and there is a movement in Wales to make the landmark fasca iliaca block standard practice, to limit opiate use.

In some S. Wales hospitals, fascia iliaca blocks are routinely placed by orthopaedic nurse practitioners, and in the N. Wales hospitals there is a move to also make this standard practice, but the issue with that is to have an ever-present constant workforce appropriately trained (& available) to deliver the block.

The obvious advantage of the fascia iliaca block being that it is a much safer block landmark-wise, and therefore has an easier learning curve. Currently some of the orthopaedic medical & nursing staff are learning these, but we are still a way off having someone trained and always available & free to undertake them for every patient.

Also my FCEM CTR was about US guided femoral & 3-in-1 blocks, but most of the evidence is US vs. Nerve stim & always tend to be in elective pre-ops rather than traumatic injuries, so there is the issue about generalisability.

Ash Basu,
Consultant Emergency Physician,
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
From: william niven<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Dear all
We are currently putting together a national guideline for the ED management of fractured NOF in Ireland. Not wishing to re-invent the wheel, we have been borrowing extensively from  both the NICE and SIGN guidelines. Some pain management issues nevertheless require some clarification which I would be grateful for your thoughts and reflections on!

1. NICE does not clarify initial dosages for the admin of opioids. Reading the following articles from anaesthesiology  had some interesting insights but was nevertheless in a post-op, PACU setting with close monitoring and small nurse to pt ratios. Unsure of its generalizability...
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/Fulltext/2002/01000/Postoperative_Titration_of_Intravenous_Morphine_in.9.aspx
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/Fulltext/2002/01000/Anesthesiology_and_Geriatric_Medicine__Mutual.6.aspx
Does anyone have any specific policy with respect to IV opiates in the elderly, or has there been any reliable research done on this in the ED setting?

2. The use of 3 in 1 / fascia iliaca blocks is gaining popularity. The evidence seems to suggest that we should be doing these under US guidance.
a) Are any departments doing these as a standard of care?
b) Is it ED or anaesthetics personnel that are doing them?
c) Have any departments been pushing this under US guidance?
A good best-bet was done on this topic http://bestbets.org/bets/bet.php?id=1024 but the real crux of the issue seems to be related to implementation and capacity building in departments with junior docs and poor staffing.

3) Does anyone do any form of initial delerium screening on their NOF patients in the ED? If not, should we, or should this be the remit of ortho-geriatrics / anaesthetics/ICU?

Lots of questions, looking forward to your responses!
Regards
Will Niven



--
Dr John Cronin
SpR in Emergency Medicine


________________________________
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and / or privileged information and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) printed above. If you are not the addressee(s), any unauthorised review, disclosure, reproduction, other dissemination or use of this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance upon the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to you in error, please return to the sender. No guarantee can be given that the contents of this email are virus free - The University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust cannot be held responsible for any failure by the recipient(s) to test for viruses before opening any attachments. The information contained in this e-mail may be the subject of public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be guaranteed. Copyright in this email and any attachments created by us remains vested in the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust.

------------------------------

Date:    Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:43:23 -0800
From:    Taj Hassan <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: <No subject given>

http://rehabilitasyonmerkezim.com/yahoo.php?curve816.img


Warm regards
Taj Hassan

------------------------------

Date:    Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:10:24 -0000
From:    Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: <No subject given>

I think Taj's account has been compromised. I'm not sure what the email he
sent is all about, but it looks a lot like spam to me, suggesting that yet
another Yahoo account may have been compromised. Taj, you need to run a
virus check and change your password for your account immediately.





From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Taj Hassan
Sent: 25 January 2013 12:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:



http://rehabilitasyonmerkezim.com/yahoo.php?curve816.img


Warm regards
Taj Hassan
1/25/2013 1:43:18 PM

------------------------------

Date:    Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:35:13 -0000
From:    Jonathan Benger <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: <No subject given>

Thanks Tim,



We have just completed recruitment to this trial (which is indeed CEM
funded), and are now commencing data analysis: results to follow.



Regards to all,



Jonathan Benger.



From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Coats Tim - Professor of
Emergency Medicine
Sent: 25 January 2013 09:42
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:







There is a current trial on the NHS Research Portfolio under the 'Injuries
and Emergencies' section
http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/Portfolio.aspx?Level1=20
<http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/Portfolio.aspx?Level1=20&Level2=112&Level
3=122&Status=34> &Level2=112&Level3=122&Status=34




16152419

FIB trial <http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7820>
- Randomised trial of the fascia-iliaca block versus the 'three-in-one'
block for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department

Open

Interventional

No



Trial outline is at
http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7820



I think that I remember that it is CEM funded,



Tim



Prof T Coats

Professor of Emergency Medicine,

University of Leicester, UK.

  _____

From: Accident and Emergency Academic List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Cronin
Sent: 23 January 2013 22:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:



Interesting what you say William about the lack of studies in the ED
setting. I was part of a recent systematic review looking for acute pain
studies in a different patient cohort & condition. The search strategy was
broad and found hundreds (almost thousands) of studies/RCTs in the post-op
and chronic pain settings. However, RCTs for pain in the emergency setting
you could count on one hand! Obviously there are challenges for doing these
studies in the ED/pre-hospital but it would be great to see more being
performed going forward.



With regard to the NOF pain protocol, I think they may have one at the
MidWestern Regional, Limerick so you could ask someone there



Good luck

John

On 23 January 2013 21:20, Ash Basu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Some of us in our ED, perform US guided 3-in-1 blocks, and there is a
movement in Wales to make the landmark fasca iliaca block standard practice,
to limit opiate use.



In some S. Wales hospitals, fascia iliaca blocks are routinely placed by
orthopaedic nurse practitioners, and in the N. Wales hospitals there is a
move to also make this standard practice, but the issue with that is to have
an ever-present constant workforce appropriately trained (& available) to
deliver the block.



The obvious advantage of the fascia iliaca block being that it is a much
safer block landmark-wise, and therefore has an easier learning curve.
Currently some of the orthopaedic medical & nursing staff are learning
these, but we are still a way off having someone trained and always
available & free to undertake them for every patient.



Also my FCEM CTR was about US guided femoral & 3-in-1 blocks, but most of
the evidence is US vs. Nerve stim & always tend to be in elective pre-ops
rather than traumatic injuries, so there is the issue about
generalisability.



Ash Basu,

Consultant Emergency Physician,

Wrexham Maelor Hospital

From: william niven <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:32 AM

To: [log in to unmask]



Dear all

We are currently putting together a national guideline for the ED management
of fractured NOF in Ireland. Not wishing to re-invent the wheel, we have
been borrowing extensively from  both the NICE and SIGN guidelines. Some
pain management issues nevertheless require some clarification which I would
be grateful for your thoughts and reflections on!



1. NICE does not clarify initial dosages for the admin of opioids. Reading
the following articles from anaesthesiology  had some interesting insights
but was nevertheless in a post-op, PACU setting with close monitoring and
small nurse to pt ratios. Unsure of its generalizability...

http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/Fulltext/2002/01000/Postoperative_Tit
ration_of_Intravenous_Morphine_in.9.aspx

http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/Fulltext/2002/01000/Anesthesiology_an
d_Geriatric_Medicine__Mutual.6.aspx

Does anyone have any specific policy with respect to IV opiates in the
elderly, or has there been any reliable research done on this in the ED
setting?



2. The use of 3 in 1 / fascia iliaca blocks is gaining popularity. The
evidence seems to suggest that we should be doing these under US guidance.

a) Are any departments doing these as a standard of care?

b) Is it ED or anaesthetics personnel that are doing them?

c) Have any departments been pushing this under US guidance?

A good best-bet was done on this topic
http://bestbets.org/bets/bet.php?id=1024 but the real crux of the issue
seems to be related to implementation and capacity building in departments
with junior docs and poor staffing.



3) Does anyone do any form of initial delerium screening on their NOF
patients in the ED? If not, should we, or should this be the remit of
ortho-geriatrics / anaesthetics/ICU?



Lots of questions, looking forward to your responses!

Regards

Will Niven







--

Dr John Cronin

SpR in Emergency Medicine





  _____

This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and / or
privileged information and is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s) printed above. If you are not the addressee(s), any
unauthorised review, disclosure, reproduction, other dissemination or use of
this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance upon the information
contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail has been sent to
you in error, please return to the sender. No guarantee can be given that
the contents of this email are virus free - The University Hospitals of
Leicester NHS Trust cannot be held responsible for any failure by the
recipient(s) to test for viruses before opening any attachments. The
information contained in this e-mail may be the subject of public disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - unless legally exempt from
disclosure, the confidentiality of this e-mail and your reply cannot be
guaranteed. Copyright in this email and any attachments created by us
remains vested in the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust.

------------------------------

End of ACAD-AE-MED Digest - 24 Jan 2013 to 25 Jan 2013 (#2013-4)
****************************************************************-- 
Scanned by iCritical.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager