Hi Sarfaraz,
not sure I understand the question correctly, as you seem to talk about
co-registration (within subject, between modalities). For this, you
would use the data from your subjects. For spatial normalization
(between subjects), I would naturally recommend using the TOM toolbox :)
Cheers,
Marko
> Hi,
>
> These days we are investigating and working on different algorithms for
> ADHD detection from fMRI images. We are using the ADHD-200 dataset
> supplied by NITRC
> (http://www.nitrc.org/plugins/mwiki/index.php/neurobureau:AthenaPipeline).
>
> Conventionally fMRI is registered with the structural MRI of the
> subject. We would like to know whether it would be better if we register
> the fMRI with the template generated by Template-o-Matic toolbox instead
> of structural MRI? Can anyone who was worked on this toolbox can kindly
> provide any input in this regard?
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Sarfaraz Hussein
--
____________________________________________________
PD Dr. med. Marko Wilke
Facharzt für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
Leiter, Experimentelle Pädiatrische Neurobildgebung
Universitäts-Kinderklinik
Abt. III (Neuropädiatrie)
Marko Wilke, MD, PhD
Pediatrician
Head, Experimental Pediatric Neuroimaging
University Children's Hospital
Dept. III (Pediatric Neurology)
Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1
D - 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Tel. +49 7071 29-83416
Fax +49 7071 29-5473
[log in to unmask]
http://www.medizin.uni-tuebingen.de/kinder/epn/
____________________________________________________
|