Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/Starlink/starlink
Commit: 482487a2a9c357e84f48c0b384508f48415367f3
https://github.com/Starlink/starlink/commit/482487a2a9c357e84f48c0b384508f48415367f3
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2012-11-20 (Tue, 20 Nov 2012)
Changed paths:
M applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_fix_data.c
Log Message:
-----------
smurf: looks like a small memory leak...
Commit: 0d718a8f0b4be114ba98a67d39384fd3dcfa87f8
https://github.com/Starlink/starlink/commit/0d718a8f0b4be114ba98a67d39384fd3dcfa87f8
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2012-11-20 (Tue, 20 Nov 2012)
Changed paths:
M applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_create_smfFilter.c
M applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_filter_mce.c
M applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_typ.h
Log Message:
-----------
smurf: MCE filter parameters can change with time
Commit: 10b4cb4090937968b8d33f7f3cac31a9669baa12
https://github.com/Starlink/starlink/commit/10b4cb4090937968b8d33f7f3cac31a9669baa12
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2012-11-20 (Tue, 20 Nov 2012)
Changed paths:
M applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_iteratemap.c
Log Message:
-----------
smurf: some preliminary code for applying MCE response to fakemap data
This is sort-of correct, but realistically the fake signal should have
the filter applied prior to adding to the real data. This is good enough
though if you just want to see what the effect is for *only* the fake
source.
Compare: https://github.com/Starlink/starlink/compare/912608949971...10b4cb409093
|