Goes with Spam
-----Original Message-----
From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton
Sent: 14 November 2012 11:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ
Doxalot? It's ages since a read the Arthurian legends
L
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics"
To:
Cc:
Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:29:53 -0000
Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ
A bit of what?? :-) p puzzled God does not exbut a helluva lot of churches are spring p in Raynes Park even threatened with the doxa lot!!
P puzzled and threatened and def of subject -better take the dog out (new dog last one was 65 years ago!!)
-----Original Message-----
From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton
Sent: 14 November 2012 11:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ
that was very sloppily said
I am not equating defence of IQ with racism
i'll just go and stand in the corner for a bit
L
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poetryetc: poetry and poetics"
To:
Cc:
Sent:Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:55:46 -0000
Subject:Re: gay and 7 and IQ
Perhaps god only exists up to 10points -But I have never met the guy
-----Original Message-----
From: Poetryetc: poetry and poetics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Upton
Sent: 14 November 2012 10:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: gay and 7 and IQ
I was listening to an exchange, I suppose you would call it, on a specialist radio programme. One side said that the problem with I Q testing is that if you repeat the test you get a different answer by up to 10 pts which is worrying. It may be generally indicative; but it is not precise
I was debating or trying to debate the existence of God the other day and the main pro God argument seemed to be that I did not understand
ttfn
L
>It did occur to me that the IQ wouldn't be understood
>It gets complex and involves relation of forces... a statistical figure is not an identified number, but a force vector. So a specific example cannot be given unlike the sort stuff that follows Aristotle confused as neo-Platonist
>There is a lot of myth around IQ testing saying it is all cultural, but that is ignorant crap, of course. IQ is not a category and to say so confuses index and category.
On 07/11/12 03:38, Lawrence Upton wrote:
> That's about it, I think.
|