Peter, I very much appreciate your great message, and you have added
intrigue :) by sharing this post.
Imagine both of our shock upon learning that It "may not have been sent by"
yours truly. That alone calls for smelling salts!
Thanks loads!
Sheila
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Peter ciccariello <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> I truly love this Sheila, perfectly punchy :)
>
> Funny how Gmail decided it was suspect. Perhaps it was "disquietingly
> sequined" or "flamboyance"...
>
> Here is the message I got.
> "This message may not have been sent by: [log in to unmask]"
>
>
> Keep them guessing!
>
> - Peter
> New work gallery - http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]
> >wrote:
>
> > Her disposition in the desert
> > seemed disquietingly
> > sequined, a repeated lapse
> > into flamboyance
> >
> > turned indisposed.
> > story after story
> > retold with shifts
> > of fact. While sloshed,
> >
> > she sized up
> > how it was during
> > one of those elections
> > in Chicago,
> >
> > that accidentally
> > included her,
> > the heavy snow.
> > The count all wrong.
> >
> >
> > Sheila E. Murphy
> >
>
>
>
> --
> New work gallery - http://invisiblenotes.blogspot.com/
> Print sales and information - http://uncommon-vision.blogspot.com/
> Ephemeral Photography - http://uncommonvision.blogspot.com/
> Poetry and writing - http://poemsfromprovidence.blogspot.com/
>
> You can find my art and writing updates on Twitter
> https://twitter.com/ciccariello
>
|