JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  November 2012

PHD-DESIGN November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Meta-Language and Terminology (resending)

From:

David Sless <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:26:46 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (56 lines)

Hi Ken and Terry,

The image of me lobbing a beer bottle is wonderful! But I doubt that you would have a bump on the head. My aim is terrible. And you would certainly not be drenched. I would NEVER throw a bottle before making sure I had emptied it. But you do have a point.

So, I will give a brief account of some black holes that I see on the philosophical event horizon albeit looking through my own telescope, which is focused on the wavelengths that interest me. In that telescope I see a constellation of black holes. Bear in mind that a constellation is a construct in which it is the human eye that joins the dots, not the objects that make up the constellation, but the connections are compelling and easily shared (though alas invisible to the naked eye).

Terry, it seems to me, teeters on the edge of the biggest black hole which was most beautifully described by Bishop Berkeley (BB). Like Terry, BB came to the view that we could not base our understanding of the universe on what we could see with our limited human eyes, because we could be mistaken and confused by illusions. BB escaped the pull of the black hole by the use of a wonderful literary and theological device—the deus ex machina. God would not let it be so. Now I suspect that Terry is a non-believer, so alas, there is no hope for Terry. He will be crushed by the weight of his own argument. Except…

As in the study of the universe, philosophy abounds in paradoxes. For example, if Terry is right, is he not subject to the same illusions? How come he can see what the rest of us cannot? Also, how can Terry call something an illusion without knowing that something else is real? Without reality there can be no illusions, unless…um…Terry is the god that will save us all. Just the thought of it is enough to make one want to give up and fall into the black hole, or perhaps go and play poker with Hume down the pub and forget philosophy.

Undaunted, Terry skips a few light years and starts getting into the orbit of another black hole, paradoxically (or perhaps oxymoronically) the black hole of colour. Colour, Terry tells us is---yes, you guessed it---an illusion. Wavelength and firing neurones is the reality. My problem with that is that when I'm in the supermarket looking for red fruit, and I haven't got my spectroscope or electroencephalograph handy, I resort to using my illusion-filled eyes. Surprisingly, I have made quite a few judgements in this flawed way and they have worked out OK. How can this be so? It gets even stranger, because my wife always asks me to get green bananas, and most of the time I get it right, even though I have a slight weakness in my green/red receptor neurones. I once pleaded with her that because of my weakness, I needed to know how her neurones fired in response to certain wavelengths, because I couldn't work out what was going on her mind when she used the word 'green'. She told me not to be smart-arse, and to do the best I can. When I get home she compliments me on my choices, we make fruit salad with all the red fruit and leave the green bananas to ripen. 

Terry at this stage is still setting up his spectroscope and is concerned that the wavelengths of the florescent lights in the supermarket might not match the spectrum of daylight, thus altering the reflected wavelengths off the fruit. As to the electroencephalograph, it's just a tangle of wires on the floor. The black hole beckons!

Ken, by contrast, is a more careful star trekker, and boldly goes where many have gone before him, ending up in the black hole of knowledge. Once again we have a paradox, but a different and much scarier one, in which knowledge and life become ignorance and death. 

Let me begin with what animals know. My dog knows his name, he knows what to do when I say 'sit' (though he sometimes pretends he hasn't heard me), and he knows he hates the cat next door. None of these claims about what my dog knows are contentious in the context of me having conversations with my neighbours, each of us exchanging views about what each of our dogs know. In the same vein, the snail in my garden knows where the lettuce are. Does my dog have to have a representation of his name or the command 'sit' or the hated cat? No, he responds directly to the sounds I make or the smell of the cat. Similarly the snail has no representation of a lettuce, it responds to the lettuce and starts eating when it gets near enough. So, here we have knowing without representation.

Now I'm going to perform a trick, a bit of sleight of hand magic. Can we share what we know? Well, Wikileaks certainly thinks so and so do the many people who both support and object to what Wikileaks does. Ken tells us we cannot share knowledge except through representation, so how come I can talk about sharing knowledge with Wikileaks without talking about representation? Am I deluded? I don't think so. It makes perfect sense to talk about shared knowledge in this way.

So what is it about 'knowledge' that has so confused and energised our best minds? It's all in the sleight of hand that lures the seeker of knowledge into the black hole of ignorance and death. I started with a statement about what my dog and snails know, and then went on to talk about sharing what we know, but in a very different context. In their respective contexts there is nothing odd or strange going on here. But when I ask about 'knowledge' out of any particular context, the problems begin and they get worse the more I try to justify any particular definition of knowledge. It's the reification, the abstraction, the taking out of context that causes the problems. It's like taking a bird out of the world and into a vacuum, to free it of the constraint of the air around it, and work out how it flies. All you end up with is a dead bird, sucked dry and lifeless.

Words are like that. They don't travel well from one context to another, and invariably change in their usage from one context to the next; only the spelling and grammar remain the same, giving the illusion that they live in one environment in much the same way as they live in another. They don't, and we don't expect them to. But once we remove them from any specific context, they die.  In the Museum of Dead Things (the well-known MDT) they can be endlessly classified, catalogued and commented on, but the danger is that they cannot then be taken out of the museum and given new life in a new context. Like Frankenstein's monster, they may not adapt to their new world. They falter and fail (and blame their maker), and crushed into nothing, fall into a black hole.

I shall go back to life and lurking.


David
-- 





blog: www.communication.org.au/dsblog
web: http://www.communication.org.au

Professor David Sless BA MSc FRSA
CEO • Communication Research Institute •
• helping people communicate with people •

Mobile: +61 (0)412 356 795
Phone: +61 (0)3 9489 8640
Skype: davidsless

60 Park Street • Fitzroy North • Melbourne • Australia • 3068




-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager