A stupidly simple summary and maybe table comparison of each would be nice for when we take it to different data "owners" to request access to their datasets
Alex
--
Emailing from my iPhone like a BOSS
On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:32, "Christopher Gutteridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yes, that's reasonable.
>
> On 02/11/2012 12:05, Nick Jackson wrote:
>> The only other one I can think of might be Open Data Commons Attribution, which seems to fit nicely between OGL and CC0.
>>
>> Nick Jackson
>> Lead Web Developer
>> CERD
>> University of Lincoln
>> [log in to unmask]
>> (+44) 01522 88 6570
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2012, at 12:00, "Christopher Gutteridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> For aggregation purposes I am going to recommend people publish datasets as OGL or CC0. Is that sane? Should we have more/less/different?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>>>
>>> Graphite PHP RDF Library v1.5 released! http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>
> --
> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248
>
> Graphite PHP RDF Library v1.5 released! http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
|