JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCPNMR Archives


CCPNMR Archives

CCPNMR Archives


CCPNMR@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCPNMR Home

CCPNMR Home

CCPNMR  November 2012

CCPNMR November 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: problems with data shifter

From:

Dr Andy Herbert <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CcpNmr software mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:10:40 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (256 lines)

Hi,

I've always been a little confused as to the point of LabelledMolecule 
if it required a different name for each labelled incarnation. I'd 
always thought that LabelledMolecule should be a subset of a particular 
Molecule that takes into account the isotopic labelling present in the 
molecule. It therefore seemed to make sense to me for a molecule to be 
able to have a number of differently labelled possibilities. So I guess 
I'd thought that Molecule should represent the chemistry of your 
molecular entity, and that this can be present with different isotopic 
compositions. Therefore LabelledMolecule should store the different 
isotopic compositions of a single chemical under the same name as the 
Molecule.

Hope I made clear my confusions.

Andy



Rasmus Fogh wrote:
> Dear Gary,
>
> This is indeed messy stuff. And something will have to be changed, it 
> looks like.
>
> As the data model stands, there can be only one LabelledMolecule for 
> each Molecule. That is correct - and code that creates more than one 
> is therefore wrong.
>
> The correct way to work according to the model would be to have a 
> separate MolLabel for every molecular labelling, and a separate 
> LabeledMixture for every distinct sample composition.
>
> It looks like the ECI is not using the model correctly, as it stands. 
> The solution could be either to change ECI (and improve the Model 
> documentation), or to change the model. Or maybe both, because if it 
> is too hard to do the things you need with the current model, we will 
> have to look at what we can do.
>
> We are pretty busy, as you know, but I shall have to look at this with 
> Pieter and Aleks.
>
> Is there anyone else who has something to contribute and would like to 
> be included in the discussion?
>
> Yours,
>
> Rasmus
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
> Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
> Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
> 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Gary Thompson wrote:
>
>> Hi wayne
>>
>> sorry more questions
>>
>> I am still slightly confused as to how this works... and also 
>> (possibly wrongly) forsee some possible problems
>>
>> 0. the labeledMolecules appear to have been created in response to 
>> creating two samples and their sample components and labelling in the 
>> eci samples page. I created two different samples with different 
>> labeling patterns ( named methanol_CN and methanol_N 100% CN and 100% 
>> N labelled respectivley).
>>
>>> From the documentation (which is pretty sparse)
>>
>> 1. A labeledMoleculed represents a labelled version of a molecule 
>> with a number of labelling patterns which are defined via molLabels 
>> and children, with there being one molLabel for each labelling 
>> pattern i.e uniform 13c vs uniform 15N 13c vs labelled 13C at residue 
>> 1 ca only
>>
>> 2. a labelledMolecule has a single element as its full key (which 
>> must be globally unique) and this is its name. This should match the 
>> name of the molecule the labeledMolecule shadows so there can only be 
>> one labeledMolecule for each Molecule
>>
>> 3. i have two labeled molecules (courtesy of eci when I created two 
>> samples) with two names methanol_N and methanol_CN which don't match 
>> my molecule
>>
>> 4. the suggestion is to rename one of them (say the one named 
>> p7:methanol_CN) to match my molecule. I presume I would then have to 
>> delete the other labeledMolecule (say the one with the name 
>> p7:methanol_N )? However then I have lost all the labelling 
>> information that goes with the other labeledMolecule (ie 
>> p7:methanol_N) and eci no longer knows about my N labelled sample...)
>>
>> 5. will this cure cause eci problems (i.e. will there be dangling 
>> references to the second labelled molecule left over ? ) for example 
>> the experiments panel contains a sample column with popups that match 
>> the names of the methanol_N and methanol_CN samples I created. Do 
>> these refer to samples and if so how do the samples relate to the 
>> labeledMolecules...
>>
>> my results from digging around are that samples refere to 
>> labeledMixtures via the following path, so if I can transfer the 
>> labeled micture over everything should be alright...
>>
>> top.project.sortedNmrProjects()[0].sortedExperiments()[<a 
>> number>].sample.sortedSampleComponents()[0].refComponent.labeledMixture.labeledMolecule 
>>
>>
>> sorry clearly plenty of confusion & worries on my part here
>>
>> regards
>> gary
>> _________________
>> From: CcpNmr software mailing list [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf 
>> Of Wayne Boucher [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 17 November 2012 00:28
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [CCPNMR] problems with data shifter
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This indeed seems to be sort-of and ECI bug. The reason I say sort-f is
>> that it seems a bit daft to me that the LabeledMolecule constructor 
>> allows
>> the name not to be that of a Molecule. (The constructor checks validity
>> but not with "complete=True".)
>>
>> The problem with fixing LabeledMolecule.name is that it is frozen. So 
>> the
>> two options would be to either edit the ccp/molecule/LabeledMolecule xml
>> file by hand or to do something like the following at the prompt:
>>
>>>>> labeledMolecule = 
>>>>> top.project.findFirstLabeledMolecule(name='p7:methanol_CN')
>>>>> labeledMolecule.__dict__['name'] = 'p7'
>>
>> The GUI would not update (we are bypassing the normal API code) but it
>> ought to save with that name and then reload ok.
>>
>> LabeledMolecule was in v1.
>>
>>
>> If you go to http://www2.ccpn.ac.uk/download/ccpnmr/ you will find older
>> releases. The data model version is indeed out of sync with Analysis
>> versions.
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rasmus
>>>
>>> Sorry more detail, I seem to be somethat confused how this came 
>>> about and
>>> what to do...
>>>
>>> I seem to have a molecule and two labelled molecules:
>>>
>>>
>>> print top.nmrProject.parent.labeledMolecules
>>>
>>> frozenset([<ccp.molecule.LabeledMolecule.LabeledMolecule
>>> ['p7:methanol_CN']>,<ccp.molecule.LabeledMolecule.LabeledMolecule
>>> ['p7:methanol_N']>])
>>>
>>> print top.nmrProject.parent.molecules
>>>
>>> frozenset([<ccp.molecule.Molecule.Molecule ['p7']>])
>>>
>>> The labelled molecules were (I believe) added as I set up samples in 
>>> the eci
>>> interface (one is labelle dmehtanol_ N and the other methanol_CN) 
>>> surely they
>>> should all refer to the same molecule (in actual fact they refer to 
>>> None)
>>>
>>>
>>> print list(top.nmrProject.parent.labeledMolecules)[0].molecule
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> print list(top.nmrProject.parent.labeledMolecules)[1].molecule
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> with names
>>>
>>>
>>> print list(top.nmrProject.parent.labeledMolecules)[0].name
>>>
>>> p7:methanol_CN
>>>
>>> print list(top.nmrProject.parent.labeledMolecules)[1].name
>>>
>>> p7:methanol_N
>>>
>>> am I right in seeming to find that this is an eci problem? NB the 
>>> original
>>> data model was imported from a version 1.0 model via the update 
>>> server, did
>>> version 1.0 have a labelledMolecule?
>>>
>>> Finally how do a I correct the names of the labelled molecules? 
>>> surely they
>>> now both have to be p7, but at the same time they are keyed by just 
>>> their
>>> name and so you can's have two called p7... with different labelling...
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, further questions: where do I find older versions of the 
>>> datamodel on
>>> the ccpn web site? secondly the version of the model on the website 
>>> is 2.05,
>>> I take it the data model version is out of sync with the analysis 
>>> software
>>> versions?
>>>
>>> once again thanks for any help
>>>
>>> regards
>>> gary
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dr Gary Thompson [Homans Lab Research Coordinator]
>>>
>>> Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology,
>>> University of Leeds,
>>> Leeds, LS2 9JT, West-Yorkshire, UK Tel. +44-113-3433024
>>> email: [log in to unmask] Fax +44-113-3431935
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Dr Andy Herbert
Department of Chemistry
University of Edinburgh
West Mains Road
Edinburgh
UK
EH9 3JJ
Tel: +44 (0)131 650 4704 or 650 7372
Email: [log in to unmask]


The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager