Hi Jeremy
we already have a ticket for gLite DPM:
https://ggus.eu/ws/ticket_info.php?ticket=87466 v
because our se is shown in https://operations-portal.in2p3.fr/csiDashboard/siteDetails/site/UKI-NORTHGRID-SHEF-HEP.
It was a ticket for gLite CREAM CE and DPM. I have retired CREAM CE.
Should I close the ticket?
thanks
Elena
On 14 Nov 2012, at 10:15, Jeremy Coles wrote:
> Dear All
>
> For those not following the GDB, you may be interested in some of the talks at http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=155074.
>
> Peter Solagna has just given an update on the middleware decommisioning timelines. Slide 9 is worth sharing:
>
> •DPM, LFC and WN will be unsupported starting from Dec 1st
> –No extension of the support expected
> •DPM
> –Raise alarms for DPM starting from Dec 1st
> –Deadline for upgrading DPM: Jan 31, 2013
> –Site managers must put unsupported DPM in downtime by Feb 1st, 2013
> •LFC timeline can be aligned with DPM
> •WN timeline to be defined in the coming few days
> –WN 2.0.1-1 is planned to be released Next Monday in UMD
>
> There is a discussion due on the latest WN release so the WN date may still change. For those sites dependent on the tarball, Matt is only just testing a general build which makes a 1st November deadline for the dependent sites rather unlikely.
>
> It is also worth repeating the news from the 1st November WLCG Operations Coordination Team meeting: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGOpsMinutes121101:
>
> "Middleware news and baseline versions (Nicolò)
>
> https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/WLCGBaselineVersions
>
> Nicolò repeats some recommendations for sites:
>
> • In general, if a site wants to upgrade a service, the EMI-2 version should be chosen
> • Sites with a gLite WMS should upgrade to version 3.3.8, which fixes important bugs
> • From today, EMI-1 gets only security updates: therefore, important bug fixes will be available only for EMI-2
> • Now the baseline version for the WN is the EMI-2 one: sites are strongly encouraged to upgrade if they still have a gLite WN, but it's less urgent if they have EMI-1 (check the WLCG WN testing page for the most recent information)
> • the EMI-2 UI has a serious bug affecting the submission to the gLite WMS; moreover the tar ball distribution is not yet available
> Peter brings up the fact that the SAM/Nagios boxes still use the gLite UI. Anyway, this is not considered a problem because it's a very controlled environment and the required functionality works as needed with gLite."
>
> regards,
> Jeremy
>
>
__________________________________________________
Dr Elena Korolkova
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel.: +44 (0)114 2223553
Fax: +44 (0)114 2223555
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Sheffield
Sheffield, S3 7RH, United Kingdom
|