On 10/03/2012 11:44 PM, Jeremy Coles wrote:
> it also seems some of the WN/torque concerns arose because of the use
> of 'older' versions. I suggest if there are ongoing concerns about
> compatibilities then these issues should be the subject of a GGUS
> ticket that we can follow-up (please let me know the ticket number if you submit one).
I have no concerns about WN/torque compatibilities if experiments back
the use
of EMI2 on the worker node. If if experiments do not back the use of
EMI2 on the
worker nodes, then I can't provide EMI2 on the CE unless I do "extra work"
using mixed repositories and stepping stone glite 3.2 updates.
Should that be the subject of this ticket you refer to. If so, I can
drop it in a
GGUS ticket by all means. Would that help?
--
Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
System Administrator office: 220
High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794 2334
University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
|