Hi all
In relation to the LLUK standards you might to look at the Lingfield Final report that was published Tuesday afternoon
http://news.bis.gov.uk/Press-Releases/Lord-Lingfield-champions-more-freedom-for-further-education-6821c.aspx
And the LSIS proposals out for consultancy at
http://www.lsis.org.uk/AboutLSIS/strategicprojects/FE-Teacher-Trainer-Qualifications-Review/Documents/TQR-Proposal-Document-Oct2012.pdf
Both have something to say about a proposed Level 7 Diploma that engages with HE in FE
Best
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Lea
Sent: 25 October 2012 11:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Level of compulsory credits in PGCert LTHE
Rachel, David et al,
Having worked with the standards frameworks developed by the HEA, SEDA, the NMC and LLUK, I think I'm right in saying that it's only the latter that have ever specified that they be met at a particular academic level, but even with LLUK (now LSIS) there was, and still is, choice for a university to validate their own awards across a range of levels - within the QAA rule that if the award is to be called `Post-Graduate...' (as opposed to Professional Graduate) then it must have some master's level credit in it.
John
John Lea
Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit
Canterbury Christ Church University
North Holmes Road, Canterbury, CT1 1QU
Telephone: 01227 767700 ext 3850
PGCLT(HE) administrator:
Nicky Galer [log in to unmask]
Telephone: 01227 782952
-----Original Message-----
From: David Baume [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tue 10/23/2012 17:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Level of compulsory credits in PGCert LTHE
Rachel
It will be fascinating to see the responses
Some history may or may not be useful. From memory:
In the early days of the SEDA teacher accreditation scheme, in the early 1990s, SEDA did not specify how long an accredited (recognised) course should last, or how many credits it should attract. However, over 50 or 60 such programmes, I think the norm became a PGCert, attracting 60 credits, and thus notionally 600 participant learning hours, which of course included much planning and teaching by the participant. (For the QAA a PGCert meant 60 credits)
When the ILTHE began to accredit (recognise) programmes, I think 60 credits was a requirement, certainly in the early days
I do not know what the Higher Education Academy currently says about credits or durations, or how any such requirements have changed over time
Where do standards lie? In the learning outcomes, the values, the underpinning knowledge? In the level of the programme? In the number of participant learning hours, and hence the number of credits? In the processes of the programme? In the assessment, which hopefully relates to the specified learning outcomes, values, knowledge? Somewhere else? Such programmes are hopefully both academic (scholarly) and professional. This can be an uneasy boundary
Others may have thoughts and information about this
Best wishes,
David
+++++
David Baume PhD SFSEDA FHEA
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
* Latest blog post August 10th 2012 http://davidbaume.com/2012/08/10/originality-part-four-becoming-critically-original/
@David_Baume
anthony.david.baume
+44 (0)1908 690 315
+44 (0)7747 045 931
From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Boulter, Rach
Sent: 22 October 2012 12:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Level of compulsory credits in LTHE
Dear All
Apologies if this question may have been asked recently - there have been a few around PGCerts flying about.
We are revalidating our PG Cert in Learning & Teaching in HE at LJMU this year and I wondered if you could advise on the following two questions:
1. How many credits within your PGCerts are compulsory?
2. How long do your staff have to complete the programme?
Any responses would be much appreciated.
Thank you
Rachel
[Liverpool John Moores University]<http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/>
Academic Enhancement, Research and Regional Engagement
Rachel Boulter FHEA, AssocCIPD, MA
Academic Professional Development Co-ordinator
Academic Enhancement Unit
Liverpool John Moores University
5th Floor, Kingsway House, Hatton Garden, Liverpool, L3 2AJ
t: 0151 231 8666 e: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
w: www.ljmu.ac.uk<http://www.ljmu.ac.uk>
[EMAIL SIG 2.JPG]
________________________________
Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose, copy, or distribute information in this email nor take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Please note that views expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Higher Education Academy. Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Although we have taken steps to ensure this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. The Higher Education Academy Registered No 4930131
|
