JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  October 2012

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Fwd: TMR 12.10.25 Burton and Kerr, The Cistercians in the Middle Ages (Newman)

From:

Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:50:21 -0400

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (209 lines) , message-footer.txt (19 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

------ Original Message ------
Received: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:40:46 AM EDT
From: The Medieval Review <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: TMR 12.10.25 Burton and Kerr, The Cistercians in the Middle Ages
(Newman)

Burton, Janet, and Julie Kerr. <i>The Cistercians in the Middle
Ages</i>. Series:  Monastic Orders. Woodbridge, UK and Rochester, NY:
Boydell & Brewer Press, 2011. Pp. viii, 244. $45.00. ISBN-13:
9781843836674.

   Reviewed by Martha G. Newman
        The University of Texas at Austin
        [log in to unmask]


<i>The Cistercians in the Middle Ages</i> provides a much needed
introduction to one of the most successful and influential monastic
congregations in medieval Europe.  The last such survey of the
Cistercian order in English was Louis Lekai's volume, initially
published in 1953 and revised in 1977 as <i>The Cistercians: Ideals
and Reality</i>, but it, like Marcel Pacaut's <i>Les moines blancs</i>
(1993), covers the history of the Cistercians into the twentieth
century.  Over the last decades, we have come to new understandings of
the early Cistercian documents, of the monks' economic activities and
their use of space, of the place of women in the order, and of the
relationship between the monks' spirituality, their social
interactions, and their material culture.  This volume, part of
Boydell & Brewer's series on Monastic Orders, engages with this recent
scholarship.  Janet Burton and Julie Kerr offer a detailed and
readable account of the Cistercians' origins and an analysis of the
distinctiveness of the medieval Cistercians' way of life.

The book is divided into an introduction and eight chapters.  The
first quarter of the book unfolds chronologically: in the introduction
and the first two chapters, the authors discuss the order's origin and
spread.  The remaining chapters present six topics: sites and
buildings, administration, daily life, spirituality, economic
practices, and relations with "the world."  Throughout the book the
overarching theme is the question of Cistercian distinctiveness.  This
is a welcome choice as both the Cistercians and their monastic
contemporaries asserted Cistercian difference.  But an analysis of
"distinctiveness" is difficult to sustain without comparisons with
other monastic congregations, and the authors seldom make these
differences explicit.  As a result, two other themes re-emerge out of
an older Cistercian historiography--the contrast between Cistercian
ideal and reality and the discussion of Cistercian impact and
influence--and the question of Cistercian distinctiveness gets lost.

There is much praiseworthy about this book.  In the introduction and
first chapter, Burton and Kerr place the Cistercians in the context of
late eleventh- and early twelfth-century movements of monastic reform
and renewal.  They suggest that the Cistercians, like other new
monastic groups, were inspired by both the ideal of the desert and a
desire to find a pure observance of the Benedictine Rule.  But they
also argue that the Cistercians differed from their contemporaries
because the New Monastery at Cîteaux was more a secession from an
existing community than a movement following an inspired holy man.
They astutely point out that, in some ways, Cîteaux should be seen not
as a beginning but as the last of Robert of Molesme's many monastic
experiments, and they emphasize the cooperation of ecclesiastical and
temporal authorities in promoting Cîteaux's foundation.

In presenting the order's origin and its spread, Burton and Kerr
judiciously pick their way through the difficult problems of the early
Cistercian documents.  They rely on Chrysogonus Waddell's dating of
the <i>Exordium parvum</i> and the <i>Exordium cistercii</i>, and they
retain the long-standing position that Stephen Harding did indeed
write the Charter of Charity and thus created not just a Cistercian
"way of life" but the first monastic "order."  They do, however, ask
what the Cistercians' idea of <i>ordo</i> meant in the 1120s,
suggesting that we should see in a variety of documents the
Cistercians' own sense of their distinctiveness and the set of
mechanisms by which they transmitted this self-identity and created
uniformity.  The authors question elements of this Cistercian self-
presentation, agreeing with Constance Berman that much Cistercian
expansion entailed incorporating already existing communities rather
than establishing abbeys <i>de novo</i>;  they also note that the
spread of Cistercian monasticism often corresponded with the
territorial ambitions of centralizing lords, whether in Wales, the
Baltic region, or Iberia.  And they recognize that, even in the
twelfth-century, women as well as men considered themselves
Cistercians.

In the excellent chapters on the Cistercians' buildings and their
economic practices, Burton and Kerr succeed in demonstrating
Cistercian distinctiveness while showing regional variations and
change.  The chapter on sites and buildings emphasizes the placement
of Cistercian abbeys in rural locations, the symbolic and practical
significance of these sites, and the simplicity and purity of
Cistercian buildings, but it also offers examples of regional
variations in design and décor, concluding that the monks
"accommodated change whilst preserving the Cistercian spirit" (81).
In the long discussion of the Cistercians' economic practices, the
conclusions are similar.  Burton and Kerr stress the flexibility of
the order:  they illuminate regional differences in the ways the monks
accumulated their lands, organized their granges, and compacted their
estates, and they discuss the ways in which many communities, by the
thirteenth-century, moved toward indirect exploitation of their lands
and commercial and industrial activities.  And they conclude that the
order's "economy was Cistercian at the core but took on a regional
gloss as communities responded to their environment" (187).

Burton and Kerr are especially interested in Cistercian practice, and
they present lovely examples of the monks' building techniques and
water works, their continued reverence for relics, their dietary
observances, their participation in mining and manufacturing, their
consolidation of lands, and their charitable offerings to the poor.
We also get a strong sense of regional variations.  But some of the
topical chapters do not synthesize their material particularly well.
In addressing the Cistercians' administrative structure, Burton and
Kerr recognize the importance of the Cistercians' Chapter General and
their abbots' visitations, but they vacillate between depicting the
move away from these practices in the later middle ages as a sign of
decline and presenting it as evidence of the order's survival and
adaptability.  Further, they discuss in much detail the authority of
the abbot, the role of monastic officials, and the process of monastic
discipline, but they note neither the similarities with other
Benedictines nor the small differences in organization that
contemporaries found so important.  The same problem emerges in the
chapter on the monks' daily life.  There we get a detailed account of
monastic observances, including discussions of food, dress, manual
labor, and liturgical practices, but the authors do not compare these
with the observances and customs of other communities.  And, even in
the chapter on the Cistercians' economic practices, we learn that the
monks' "most enduring legacy" came from their reorganization of
settlement patterns on the land (188), but we do not learn whether
these patterns were unique to the Cistercians.

More troubling to me was the chapter on the Cistercians' spirituality.
The Cistercians' articulation of religious ideas is not the authors'
focus:  their book provides one paragraph on Bernard of Clairvaux's
Song of Song's commentary (142) while devoting several pages to the
Cistercians' manufacture of clay tiles (179-181).  They nowhere
discuss Bernard's conception of "experience," and only briefly present
the Cistercians' devotion to the humanity of Christ; Rachel Fulton's
work on twelfth-century affective spirituality is absent.  The authors
do consider the Cistercians' Marian devotion, but like many others,
they confuse Bernard of Clairvaux's later reputation with his own
expressions.  For Kerr and Burton, Cistercian spirituality is a form
of "mysticism, " a term that they define, quite narrowly, as a
"temporary fusion of the human soul with the Divine" (140), yet
nonetheless consider broad enough to encompass contemplation,
spiritual friendship, a devotion to the person of Christ, and the
ecstatic (and sometimes disruptive) behaviors of lay brothers and
women.  Rather than analyzing Cistercian sermons and treatises or the
constructed quality of the saints' lives they use to depict ecstatic
behaviors, the authors again focus on practice, reminding us of the
continued importance of saints' cults, relics, and even pilgrimage
shrines for Cistercian religiosity.

The decision to organize the majority of the book topically rather
than chronologically is a wise one, given the Cistercians' many
contributions to medieval society and culture.  However, Burton and
Kerr often cull examples ranging from the twelfth to the fifteenth
century as if the period were static.  Although they at times discuss
the process of change and questions of decline, they do not usually
offer conclusions.   This lack of attention to chronology occasionally
leads to sloppiness: a shortage of lay brothers appears as early as
1208 (175), the lay brotherhood reached the highpoint of its power in
the mid-thirteenth century (159), it experienced its "demise" in the
late thirteenth-century (152), and yet its "decline" was exacerbated
by the Black Death in the mid-fourteenth (159).  And while I
appreciate the authors' efforts to present examples from across Europe,
there is an overemphasis on the British Isles; the Cistercians in
Germany and Italy, for instance, are nearly absent.

<i>The Cistercians in the Middle Ages</i> emphasizes monastic practice.
Burton and Kerr provide a picture of Cistercian diversity and depict
the everyday lives of Cistercian monks rather than analyzing the ideas
of their extraordinary men--they give us much less information about
the everyday lives and observances of Cistercian women.  It may be
that the Cistercians' economic practices had a greater impact on
European society than did their abbots' spiritual writings.  Certainly,
R. A. Donkin and others have long stressed the Cistercians' economic
and geographic significance, and Geraldine Carville's work on the
Cistercians in Ireland has reinvigorated this argument.  It also may
be that the Cistercians, as "reformed Benedictines," were not as
distinctive as they claimed and that the religious observances and
outlook of the great majority of Cistercian monks and nuns differed
little from their contemporaries.  But the authors merely gesture
toward both these arguments; they neither make them explicit nor
develop the comparisons needed to make them convincing.  As a result,
students reading this volume will learn much about the Cistercians'
monastic observances and economic activities, but they will be hard
pressed to articulate the distinctive qualities of the medieval
Cistercian Order.






**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html



medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture The Medieval Review https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/3631 ********************************************************************** To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME to: [log in to unmask] To send a message to the list, address it to: [log in to unmask] To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion to: [log in to unmask] In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to: [log in to unmask] For further information, visit our web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager