JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ITALIAN-STUDIES Archives


ITALIAN-STUDIES Archives

ITALIAN-STUDIES Archives


ITALIAN-STUDIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ITALIAN-STUDIES Home

ITALIAN-STUDIES Home

ITALIAN-STUDIES  October 2012

ITALIAN-STUDIES October 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CFP . Eneide, Libro VI e la sua Ricezione/ Aeneid Six and its Cultural Reception

From:

Matteo Soranzo <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Scholarly discussions in any field of Italian studies <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:12:44 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (159 lines)

italian-studies: Scholarly discussions in any field of Italian studies

Aeneid Six and its Cultural Reception

The Villa Vergiliana in Cumae, Italy

June XXX 2013

Outside of the Bible, no text has had as profound an impact on Western
Culture as the Aeneid, and within the Aeneid, no book has been as
influential as Aeneid Six. Ovid was perceptive enough to recognize its
profound novelty, when his Sibyl refers to Vergil’s underworld as
novissma regna mundi (Met. 14.111). By the time of Servius the
novissima regna had been arranged according various intellectual
disciplines such at historia, philosophia, and theology with numerous
scholiasts commenting on the many cruces posed by the text. The
novelty and intellectual expansiveness of the Book allowed the text to
have a number of reincarnations and afterlives. As Aeneas moves
through the underworld Vergil constructs a literary space that has
spawned countless literary and artistic responses. The ecphrastic
program of the journey offered to later generations a storehouse of
images, which could be articulated in painting, relief and literature.
The philosophical and theological incorporation of Orphism,
Pythagoreanism, Platonism, and Stoicism raises important
considerations about the ontology of the soul and the poetics of
eschatology, which could be harnessed by Christian Theologians for
their own ends. The blurring of genres in Aeneid Six—of Epic, Tragedy,
Comedy, Ethnography—along with the movement from fabula to historia
during Aeneas’ journey inaugurated a new poetic aesthetic. It changed
how cultures evaluated and understood poetic inspiration. Its ambition
and scope changed what literature was and what it would become. Vergil
responds to the entirety of Greek and Roman literary and intellectual
achievement as he circumscribes it within the domain of the Aeneid and
in so doing he provides a roadmap for later artists, poets and
thinkers to achieve similar ends, but for different purposes. It is
not an overstatement to suggest that Western Culture and significant
aspects of its development hinge and pivot along the literary,
religious, and philosophical lines of Aeneid Six.

The central problem of the text is how do researches confront the
scale of this work and its various iterations? It is a humble truth to
recognize that Aeneid Six as an act of cultural reception is beyond
the knowledge and scholarly skill of a single individual. Its
reception necessitates scholarly conversation and investigation in an
interdisciplinary and international context. From this perspective
Aeneid Six is a perfect test case for theoretical and practical
applications of reception, and it allows scholars to think about the
underlying causes for the rise of reception studies over the last two
decades. It is the primary aim of the conference to come to a new
understanding of reception as a process of continuity and change from
the Classical era to the present. How does conceiving of Aeneid Six as
a product of reception as well as a catalyst for other receptions
illuminate receptions studies? How does Vergil channel the vast
complex of prior literature, philosophy and religion into his poem and
how does this contribute to the meaning of the Aeneid? Does Vergil
create a coherent eschatology or does the polyphony of traditions
result in contradictory stances? How do later thinkers and artists
respond to Vergil’s artistic vision” How and why was Aeneid Six
established as a central text for reception, and just as importantly
why has it been displaced within the last few generations?

Under the auspices of the Vergilian Society scholars and students are
invited to submit abstracts of 300-500 words on Aeneid Six and its
reception. In particular, abstracts on following issues will be
especially welcome:

*The reception of prior Greco-Roman art and thought.
*The meaning of Aeneid Six within Vergil’s poetic output and its
immediate impact on Roman literature and culture.
*Studies on the scholastic tradition from Servius to Norden.
*The reception of Aeneid Six from Late Antiquity to the Early Modern period.
*Papers on the place of Aeneid Six in religious, philosophical and
intellectual history.
*Analyses of Aeneid Six in light of archaeological findings, material
culture and art history.
*Discussions on the theoretical underpinnings which inform reception studies.

Papers should aim to be no more than 30 minutes in length. Abstracts
should be submitted no later than November 15st 2012. Notification of
acceptance will follow soon after. Please send abstracts as a PdF
attachment to [log in to unmask]

Eneide, Libro VI e la sua Ricezione
Villa Vergiliana a Cuma, Italia
30 giugno, 2013

Ad eccezione della Bibbia, nessun testo ha avuto un impatto tanto
profondo sulla cultura occidentale quanto l’Eneide, ed all’interno
dell’Eneide, nessun libro è mai stato influente quanto il Libro VI. Fu
Ovidio il primo lettore a rendersi conto della novità di questo testo,
quando la sua Sibilla si riferisce all’oltretomba virgiliano come
“novissma regna mundi” (Met. 14.111). Ai tempi di Servio, i “novissima
regna” erano già organizzati a seconda di vari campi del sapere come
la storia, la filosofia e la teologia, mentre nel frattempo numerosi
scoliasti si impegnavano a risolvere molte delle cruces interpretative
poste dal testo virgiliano. La novità e i riferimenti intellettuali
del Libro VI hanno consentito a questo testo di avere un gran numero
di reincarnazioni e riscoperte, ispirando non solo grandi opere
letterarie, ma anche la pittura, il bassorilievo e la scultura assieme
alla filosofia. Il Libro VI, tuttavia, continua a porsi come uno dei
casi più interessanti di ricezione e trasformazione di una tradizione
letteraria e intellettuale sviluppata in Grecia e a Roma; Virgilio
stesso, infatti, intendeva rispondere alla cultura greca e romana
fornendone una sintesi nel testo dell’Eneide, senza dimenticare
l’immediato successo del Libro VI presso Ovidio, Lucano, Seneca e
Stazio. Non è esagerato affermare che la cultura occidentale e la sua
storia dipendono e si muovono attorno alle componenti letterarie,
religiose e filosofiche del Libro VI dell’Eneide.

Inoltre, il Libro VI dell’Eneide è al centro delle numerose forze e
tensioni che caratterizzano il mondo delle discipline umanistiche
mentre università e college stanno sperimentando un più sentito
bisogno di cooperazione e ricerca interdisciplinare. Che la ricezione
del Libro VI dell’Eneide sia una tematica che travalica le conoscenze
e competenze di un singolo individuo è una constatazione che deve
essere al centro di una discussione attraverso le discipline. In
questo senso, il testo di Virgililo permette di riflettere sulla
storia e le prospettive degli studi sulla ricezione di testi antichi
emersi negli ultimi vent’anni.

Sotto gli auspici della Vergilian Society, studiosi e studenti sono
cordialmente invitati ad inviare un abstract di 300-500 parole sul
Libro VI dell’Eneide e sulla sua ricezione. In particolare, saranno
presi in considerazione interventi su alcuni di questi argomenti:
• La rielaborazione di fonti Greco-Romane precedenti all’Eneide.
• Il significato del Libro VI all’interno del corpus virgiliano e il
suo impatto sulla cultura e letteratura di Roma antica.
• La storia dell’esegesi da Servio a Norden.
• La ricezione del Libro VI dalla tarda antichità al Rinascimento.
• Il ruolo del Libro sesto nella storia della filosofia e degli intellettuali.
• Analisi del Libro VI alla luce di scoperte archeologiche, cultura
materiale e storia dell’arte.
• Discussioni suo fondamenti teorici degli studi sulla ricezione.


Gli interventi devono contenersi a trenta minuti di durata. Gli
abstract devono essere inviati entro il 15 novembre, e l’accettazione
sarà comunicata subito dopo. Si prega  di inviare gli abstract in
allegato email a  [log in to unmask]

-- 
Matteo Soranzo
McGill University
Department of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures
Assistant Professor
Tel. 5143982833

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join italian-studies YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave italian-studies
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/italian-studies.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager