On Oct 24 2012, Nicky Ransom wrote:
> I suppose National Archives has a relationship to the manifestation,
> rather than the work, and then the only option in the RDA Appendix is
> "Broadcaster", which clearly isn't right! I probably wouldn't give them
> an entry as they are part of the publication statement and Facet don't
> get an added entry, but I'm happy to be corrected!
I went and checked rules because I wanted to justify my transcription of
National Archives in the publisher statement too. I'm including it in
publisher based on 2.8.4, though this is optional and it's only core RDA to
have the first named publisher.
As regards the access point, I think that there's a rule for including
publisher as corporate body with relationhip to the manifestation in 21.3
that I feel justifies giving an access point. However, I completely agree
that the only relationship designator listed for this in the Appendix is
"broadcaster" which definitely doesn't work.
Celine
|