Thanks - the whole 264 thing I'm still getting to grips with!
Katrina
-----Original Message-----
From: C.J. Carty [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:33
To: Clifford, Katrina M
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] discussion of record 2
Isn't a printing date a "date of manufacture" and therefore could be
recorded with the appropriate coding in 264?
Celine
On Oct 24 2012, Clifford, Katrina M wrote:
> Thanks Marilyn, I had wondered about recording that - especially for
> reprints much later than the original... anyone got any suggestions?
>
>Katrina
>
> From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Clarke, Marilyn Sent: 24 October 2012 11:22 To:
> [log in to unmask] Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] discussion of record 2
>
>Hello
>
>Great discussion so far - thanks.
>
>Two questions:
>
> We're wondering if the presence of |e will interfere with Authority
> headings.
>
>Do we record 'Reprinted digitally'.
>
>Kind regards
>
>Marilyn
>
>Imperial College
>
>
>
>
>This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>Security System.
>
>This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
>Security System.
--
Céline Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
|